For Sale: El gobierno de Afganistan está en temporada de Rebajas. Traición !

For Sale: Afghanistan’s Government

Diana    West


Posted by Diana West

Last Sunday, the New York Times

El domingo pasado, el New York Times describió una escena cruda . Hubo un avión presidencial de Afganistán en la pista el aeropuerto de Teherán, a la espera de un último pasajero antes de alzar  ruedas hasta Kabul.  El pasajero que faltaba era el embajador de Irán en  Afganistán.  El embajador, Feda Hussein Maliki, se subió a bordo y tomó su asiento tarde junto a Omar Daudzai, el presidente Hamid Karzai de Afganistán, el jefe de personal y su  más cercano asesor.  Maliki se presentó luego ante Daudzai con una bolsa de plástico repleta de 1 millón de dólares en paquetes de euros.

karzai2

From Iran with love.

. Este, informó el Times, era “parte de una corriente secreta y constante de dinero en efectivo iraní con la intención de comprar la lealtad del señor Daudzai y promover el interés de Irán en el palacio presidencial” en Kabul.

Ya es bastante malo, pero se pone peor.

El martes, el New York Times reveló que no era sólo el jefe de los afganos el  infame anti-estadounidense de la casa del personal de transporte por carretera con Moolah mulá como se informó originalmente. Karzai estaba personalmente en esta revisión.  Respondiendo a una pregunta en una conferencia de prensa el lunes sobre si su jefe de personal había recibido efectivamente en dinero iraní, Karzai respondió, la materia-de-hecho, la práctica de todo el gobierno, “transparente”, incluso: “Ellos nos dan bolsas de dinero – sí, sí, se hace.  Estamos agradecidos a los iraníes por esto. “

Welcome to transparency, Afghanistan-style: payola in plain sight. Y ¿por qué no? ” En ese bazar maravilloso que es Afganistán, Karzai dijo, “El patriotismo tiene un precio.”

Pero, ¿qué suckerhood precio?  Lamento decir que esto es sólo el botín izquierdo en Afganistán por parte de  los Estados Unidos.  Irán, un patrocinador mundial del terror jihadista mucho antes de que Al Qaeda atacó a Estados Unidos el 9 / 11, al mismo tiempo ha pasado la mayor parte de las compras de la última década, engatusando , presionando , sobornando  y obligando a su influencia en los círculos más altos de nuestra llamada a  iraquíes y afganos “aliados”, incluso en su lucha contra las tropas estadounidenses en los campos de batalla de los mismos iraquíes y afganos.  Esta serie más reciente de las noticias acerca de nuestros afganos “aliados” es sólo la bolsa de dinero en efectivo que rompió el bombeo de vuelta – o debería tener. La pregunta es, ¿cómo podemos pedirle al ejército estadounidense  luchar y posiblemente morir por la República Islámica de Afganistán, cuando la misma República Islámica del gobierno de Afganistán está descaradamente inseretrada en el bolsillo de Irán incluso al mismo tiempo que Irán está entrenando a combatientes talibanes para reducirla y matar soldados americanos? También esta semana, el Washington Examiner informó que Irán está entrenando a combatientes talibanes en el uso de misiles tierra-aire. ? Aparte de la lucha contra fuerzas de la OTAN junto con los Estados Unidos en Afganistán, ¿hay un aliado de la izquierda en Afganistán?

Lo que estamos presenciando en Afganistán es la plantilla bifurcada de  Irán perfeccionada en Irak, que se infiltró en  los círculos de gobierno hasta que los estadounidenses lucharon arriesgando sus vidas y extremidades en el campo de batalla para que el gobierno iraquí mismo le traicioinara .

But Zombie Nation —  – al menos cuando se trata de las dos guerras donde soldados estadounidenses permanecieron atrapados  – no valora la situación, y mucho menos de que se trate. . En cuanto a nuestro liderazgo va, todo es mucho más que administrar, para poner en contexto, para racionalizar y seguir adelante. Pero no es la guerra más importante que el giro? porque  no mucho “spin” mantiene la guerra en una falta de definición.

Caso en cuestión: “No cuestionamos el derecho de Irán a prestar asistencia financiera a Afganistán, ni ponemos en duda el derecho de Afganistán a aceptar la asistencia”, dijo el portavoz del Departamento de Estado, Philip Crowley. . Esa es una manera de evitar respuestas desagradables.

Crowley continuó: “Lo que pensamos que es importante es que los afganos tengan la posibilidad de forjar su propio futuro, sin influencias negativas de sus vecinos. Dejaremos que el Gobierno de Afganistán hable con la forma en que gastan la asistencia financiera recibida de otros países, pero seguimos siendo escépticos de los motivos de Irán debido a su historia de jugar un papel desestabilizador con sus vecinos. ” Esperamos que Irán tendrá la responsabilidad de desempeñar un papel constructivo en el futuro de Afganistán “.

. Por lo tanto, no ponemos en duda la asistencia iraní financiera (o bolsas de efectivo) o la aceptación de Afganistán de la ayuda iraní financiera (o bolsas de efectivo), pero “siguen siendo escépticos” del “papel desestabilizador” de Irán, así como nosotros tenemos  “la esperanza” de que Irán jugará un “papel constructivo”, sutilezas diplomáticas a un lado, hay tales limitaciones a doble lenguaje .. No es rival para el doble juego que Irán está jugando, en el que el tío Sucker tendrá la suerte de volver a casa con sólo un premio consuelo o monedad para las golosinas.

Porqué la Universidad de North Dakota entrena estudiantes saudíes, para pilotos?

Yo me preguntaría mas bien : Que hacen estudiantes saudíes en las Universidades americanas cuando los propios americanos no pueden pagar sus estudios?

Why is the University of North Dakota training Saudi students to be pilots?

Avión que transportaba a estudiantes de Arabia  fue desviado al aeropuerto de North Dakota, marcado por  bombas a bordo

Star Tribune Un vuelo de Minneapolis, a Grand Forks que transportaba a 20 pasajeros, entre ellos a tres estudiantes de la aviación saudíes nuevos en  los EE.UU., fue desviado a Fargo y buscado después por  la tripulación de explosivos que determinó  que el detector de humo había sido manipulado en  un baño, dijeron las autoridades.

El comportamiento de los pasajeros, y no la nacionalidad de los pasajeros en el vuelo del domingo, estaba detrás de la decisión de suspender  el vuelo, Pinnacle Airlines portavoz de Amy Howell dijo el martes.

Los tres estudiantes  hablaban  poco de Inglés y acababan de llegar a los EE.UU. desde Arabia Saudí para estudiar aviación en la Universidad de Dakota del Norte. Ellos fueron detenidos por la policía del aeropuerto de Minneapolis durante unos 20 minutos, pero se cles permite abordar el vuelo una vez que sus pasaportes y visas de estudiantes fueron revisados, UND investigador Pablo de León, que estaba en el vuelo, dijo al Grand Forks Herald.

De Leon dijo que uno de los estudiantes tras utilizar el baño de avión. “Alrededor de 10 o 15 minutos más tarde, pude sentir que el avión estaba disminuyendo la altitud, y el piloto dijo que debemos estar listos para el descenso “, dijo.

. La Administración de Seguridad en el Transporte dijo el domingo que la búsqueda de explosivos a bordo del avión Bombardier CRJ200 que también transportaba a tres miembros de la tripulación resultó en nada.  Los pasajeros fueron llevados en autobús los 75 km hacia el Grand Forks.

Los tres estudiantes sauditas son parte de un contrato UND firmado el mes pasado con el Ministerio saudí del Interior para entrenar a pilotos, el vocero Peter Johnson le dijo al Herald.

Los estudiantes estaban perplejos por toda la conmoción del  domingo, dijo. Planean tener-como-un-segundo idioma clases de Inglés antes de comenzar sus estudios de pilotos. (Have they learned how to say, “We don’t want to learn how to land?”)

. Quince de los 19 hombres que secuestraron aviones y llevó a cabo el atentado del 11. 09  de 2001,  eran de Arabia Saudita. Varios de los atacantes estaban matriculados en escuelas de vuelo de EE.UU..

Gates of Vienna News Feed 10/30/2010

The packages carried on cargo planes from Yemen heading for the USA definitely contained bombs, according to the latest reports. The explosive material employed was PETN, the same chemical used by the lap bomber last Christmas, but considerably more powerful. At least one of the devices was intended to be triggered by a cell phone detonator.

In other news, German Chancellor Angela Merkel seems to have contradicted her earlier remarks about the failure of Multiculturalism, and is now insisting that affirmative action is needed to bring more immigrants into public jobs in Germany.

To see the headlines and the articles, open the full news post.

Thanks to C. Cantoni, DF, Fjordman, Insubria, JP, SF, TB, and all the other tipsters who sent these in.

Counteryijad en Dinamarca. La paciencia se acaba los daneses dicen: Basta!

DENMARK climbs on the anti-Muslim bandwagon, blames failed immigration policies of social democrats

Esto no es una guerra de religiones -, sino más bien un enfrentamiento entre una cultura oscura sobre la base de una religión que predica la sumisión del hombre a Dios, la sumisión de las mujeres a los hombres, y la sumisión de los no musulmanes, a los musulmanes – yniegan por una ideologia  iluminada , los principios occidentales de  la igualdad orientadas a la cultura moderna basados en el principio de que toda persona tiene y asume la responsabilidad para él y los suyos.

Islam in Europe A few days ago Pia Kjærsgaard,, leader of the Danish People’s Party (DPP), , criticó al spu danés Lars PM Løkke Rasmussen, diciendo que el nuevo plan de gobierno contra el problema gueto es evitar el problema de fondo. Cuando hoy tenemos barrios en Dinamarca, donde los partidarios de los atentados terroristas de Hizb ut-Tahrir, en una asociación con feas bandas locales de inmigrantes, establece el orden del día, hay básicamente dos razones para ello.

http://www.youtube.com/v/mfdEcYY6M1w&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1

En primer lugar, es el resultado de   25 años de política de inmigración  dirigida por los socialdemócratas y los socialistas-del Partido Liberal (coalición SR). En segundo lugar, porque durante años nos hemos olvidado de vacunar a los inmigrantes que vinieron aquí con los valores occidentales y daneses. En otras palabras, los problemas concretos que hoy se reúnen en los guetos, están estrechamente vinculados a dejar de lado la guerra de valores.

. El primer ministro no toma riesgos sin querer repetir los diez años de la política SR pero no se atreve  simplemente a tratar de resolver problemas concretos sin tener en cuenta las razones principales de la causa de estos  problemas que surgieron. Llamadas a una  la guerra cultural seran fatales.Es decir, la guerra cultural se empuja desde los guetos en su trayectori.

Es ciertamente el problema con un determinado grupo de inmigrantes no son los  vietnamita, chino, tailandés o chilenos jóvenes quienes se  conducen alrededor de los guetos y hacen  las calles inseguras.  No son los  hindúes o sikhs quienes  exigen una prohibición sobre el alcohol y los perros en los barrios daneses. SON LOS  musulmanes.

http://www.youtube.com/v/nL2cMrZkbEw&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1

. Es la juventud nacida de los palestinos, turcos, libaneses, somalíes, paquistaníes, iraquíes y sirios que dominan la escena de la calle en los barrios con problemas, llame en  nombre de los daneses, a  irrumpir en las casas de los ancianos y los discapacitados e impedir  el uso de sus apartamentos para celebrar consultas sobre el futuro de su  actividad penal delictiva y en la exposición al completo de su misógino comportamiento agresivo contra las niñas que no cumplen con los criterios que – a menudo estan basados en el Islam

Si queremos resolver los problemas de los guetos musulmanes en el futuro, es parte de ello, mantener a los alborotadores potenciales fuera del país, en parte  decirle a los extranjeros y sus descendientes que se encuentran en Dinamarca, y que estan a su  cargo que deben hacer sus maletas. Siempre  que usted no acepte completamente los valores que son fundamentales a Dinamarca y el Occidente en general – las libertades, la igualdad, la democracia y la solidaridad –  debe buscar otro lugar para estar.

http://www.youtube.com/v/IP-EWs-vdJE&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1

. No debe haber lugar para la inflamación islamista del fuego de ut Hiab-Tahrir, y no hay lugar ni para los hombres de  la sombra de la Fe, la Sociedad Islámica en Dortheavej u otros fanáticos islamistas, que por desgracia – con éxito – tratan de influir en los jóvenes inmigrantes odio a  la sociedad danesa y sus  valores, cuya consecuencia ha sido la de enterrar a los países islámicos en la pobreza material y espiritual.

T La batalla de los valores deben ser combatidos en las escuelas públicas. Cuando los libros de texto no se atreven a mostrar el resultado de las caricaturas de Mahoma, o ser crítico con el Islam, cuando los profesores de religión dicen que están preocupados por la exposición de las fuentes del Islam a la misma crítica al que someten  el cristianismo o el judaísmo, porque eso sería racísmo, muestra que tenemos un problema.¿Los estudiantes aprenden en la escuela pública, por ejemplo, que el fondo de las cruzadas cristianas en el mundo musulmán fue la conquistade Europa y su invasion planeada por las fuerzas de Mahoma?

¿La Batalla de Viena en 1683 nada significa en absoluto para los jóvenes daneses? ¿Te atreves a enseñar a los jóvenes turcos en Dinamarca sobre el Genocidio Armenio? Y todavía hay interrogantes sobre si era Osama bin Laden y sus compinches, quienes derribaron las  torres del World Trade Center?

http://www.youtube.com/v/thiGwDdTqsM&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1

¿Y qué con el día a día va para Firefox en la escuela pública? ¿Es respeto del  uno al otro cuando nos enteramos de que las jóvenes danesas y extranjeras que no se visten de acuerdo a los reglamentos del Islam están marcadas como putas? O cuando las pandillas de los hermanos pequeños también aquí se establecen en la búsqueda del poder y pasan por alto al profesor y a los estudiantes?  O cuando los estudiantes de origen extranjero hablan en su propio idioma y por lo tanto mantienen  fuera a los estudiantes daneses?

Con Lars Løkke Rasmussen, y el gobierno parece que, lamentablemente, estamos volviendo a la vieja rutina familiar que dice que si sólo se adaptará, tiene  un trabajo y aprende el idioma  danés, todo va a ser bueno. Independientemente de que acepte nuestros  valores .

http://www.youtube.com/v/VEAVAxt9ekI&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1

. Claro, nuestra insistencia en que los valores occidentales son muy superiores a los valores islámicos tiéne que molestar a algunos. Así será nuestra insistencia en la igualdad de género y en persona y el derecho a decidir su propia religión. . ¿Decidir quién es él o ella con quien va a casarse y el derecho a pensar, hablar, escribir y dibujar lo que quieras.

Pero llamar a  la batalla de los valores y la devoción a la solución de problemas concretos, no traerá la paz laboral que el primer ministro , aparentemente está  buscando. . La solución a los problemas que van de la mano.  No es una solución fácil.

 

No hay soluciones fáciles para la integración de los extranjeros en la sociedad danesa – pero la solución se mantiene o cae segun si estamos firmemente plantados o no,  en los valores fundamentales de esta sociedad. Y ellos no vienen por sí mismos  a buscarnos – tenemos que luchar por ellos.

RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:

denmark-muslims-throw-rocks-at-danish-citizens-while-shouting-f-the-danes

denmark-government-braces-for-new-muslim-riots-over-muhammad-cartoons

shhhh-denmarks-burning-but-dont-tell-anyone-its-muslims-who-are-are-doing-it

denmark-muslims-prove-that-violence-works

somali-muslim-tries-to-kill-danish-muhammad-cartoonist-kurt-westergaard

first-came-the-murderous-riots-in-the-streets-by-danish-muslims-over-the-muhammad-cartoons

you-apologize-no-you-apologize

muslim-asylum-seekers-wonder-why-they-cant-get-automatic-residency-in-denmark

immigrant-aka-muslim-gang-related-violence-is-terrorizing-danish-citizens

danish-cartoonist-defends-his-offensive-muhammad-cartoons-as-free-speech

all-danes-and-jews-must-die-says-lebanese-family-that-has-forced-23-christian-neighbors-from-their-homes-in-denmark

stupid-denmark-arrests-15-year-old-boy-for-anti-islam-signs


http://www.youtube.com/v/3C_5s86aiNY&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1

 

30.10.10 Un día de vergüenza para la libertaria Holanda.El día en el que Eurabia enterró la Democracia. Violencia programada por las autoridades britanicas y holandesas, contra el EDL.

A Day of Shame for Holland

 

El siguiente informe sobre los acontecimientos de hoy en Amsterdam fue escrito por Paul Weston, en colaboración con otros miembros del Colectivo Counterjihad.

Amsterdam: EDL, rompieron parabrisas

. El día de hoy la EDL visitó Amsterdam para el caso de que la libertad de expresión y la pérdida permanente de nuestra democracia en Europa lo cual  no es sólo una conspiración de derecha, sino una realidad concreta.
Y la realidad ha demostrado claramente que no sólo es concreto, sino de hierro fundido.

. El alcalde de Amsterdam Eberhard van der Laan llevó la EDL en una emboscada.

. Mientras que los defensores de la democracia se reunieron en el apropiado nombre de “Isolatorweg” zona de Amsterdam portuaria y de aislamiento , los chicos del  EDL en ruta en el autobús contratado.

La manifestación comenzó a las 14:00, pero comenzó sin el EDL.  ¿Dónde estaban, nos preguntamos?
Por último se nos dijo – que se había establecido, una emboscada, y traicion por el Ayuntamiento de Amsterdam.

Policías montados, cañones de agua, perros, escudos antimotines, un helicóptero de la policía y una presencia policial masiva y no podian dejar de aparecer 100 simpatizantes islámicos de izquierda para  atacar el transporte EDL. (los del EDL eran solamente 60 personas en la camioneta)
. Tommy Robinson y los miembros de su EDL aparecieron de repente, maltratados, con  hemorragias y shock.
La policía había permitido que su autobús pudiera  ser utilizado – circulando muy lentamente – a través de los manifestantes de izquierda.

Todas las ventanas se rompieron, con ladrillos, botellas y botas que fueron lanzados en su contra.

Amsterdam: EDL # 3
En un momento  la policía detuvo el autobús y se obligó  a los chicos del EDL a correr entre dos filas de 300 metros de chuzma con odio feroz y violencia.
Y tuvieron que abrirse paso a través, sin protección policial, tras lo cual las cosas se pusieron aún peor. La policía holandesa, que actúa con  el asesoramiento de la policía británica, declaró que no podía garantizar su protección, y les ordenó que abandonaran la zona.

. Por lo tanto, una libertad de expresión rally se redujo debido a la violencia de izquierda, y al EDL no se les permitió ejercer su derecho democrático de protesta pacífica en el corazón de la democracia liberal y tolerante de Europa.

Traición!!!!!. traición total y absoluta, que no se realiza por el Islam, sino por nuestros propios políticos.

Un día triste, como Tommy Robinson señaló. La  Democracia y Holanda fueron avergonzados. El día de hoy la EDL visitó Amsterdam para demostrar  el caso de que la libertad de expresión y la pérdida permanente de nuestra democracia en Europa no es sólo una conspiración de derecha, sino una realidad concreta.

Y la realidad ha demostrado claramente que no sólo concreto, sino de hierro fundido.

Desde Alemania:

Queridos amigos: Nosotros tambien estuvimos en  Amsterdam. Podemos testificar que todas las historias transmitidas en los Medios britanicos y holandeses son falsas, y propagandisticas . Se trata de mostrar a los criticos del Islam como  “far right”atemorizando a los participantes quienes constantemente se sienten obligados a “justificarse”.
sky news

Hundreds of people are expected to attend the demonstration, with members of the English Defence League (EDL) also invited by their Dutch counterparts.

Authorities moved the rally from a city centre location to an industrial site on the outskirts of Amsterdam for fear of violence.

“We are not aggressors, we are peaceful people who care about democracy and our country,” a spokesman for the European Freedom Initiative told Sky News.
Pronto fotos:

El enemigo dentro: Anjem Choudary

Anjem Choudary Gets Owned By Arab Christian Part I-II

Porqué no está preso o deportado?

And Now For Something Completely Different…

…Well, not different at all, actually. It’s more of the same, just moved across the Channel and/or the Atlantic.

As Vlad says, Anjem Choudary is so helpful to our cause that we might as well put him on the payroll. Silver-tongued taqiyya artists like Imam Rauf and Tariq Ramadan soothe us with pretty lies, but Mr. Choudary reliably gives out the straight dope on Islam, every time, without fail. Sharia for him, for me, and for you, by suasion if possible, by murder and terror if necessary.

………….

Comentario aparte: No tiéne una voz un tanto aflautada? Acaso no pasó la pubertad o se junta demasiado con los talibanes?….

Se escucha el rumor de los cazcos de los caballos, desde el oeste suenen los metales! Hijos del Profeta esconderos debajo de las piedras! La Counteryijad ha llegado a Europa! Ya era hora!

Paul Weston – We Will Hold You to Account

“We Will Hold You to Account”

Update: Paul Weston in German at Europe News .

A continuación es el discurso pronunciado en la manifestación de hoy en Generatorstraat en Amsterdam por el autor británico y ex candidato a parlamentario Paul Weston.


Paul Weston Hello. My name is Paul Weston, and I represent the International Free Press Society.

Y yo estoy parado aquí hoy porque nuestras élites liberales han traicionado nuestros países al Islam.

Hace cuarenta y dos años, el político Británico Enoch Powell dio su famoso “Ríos de Sangre” libertad de expresión, en la que afirmaba que “La función suprema del arte de gobernar es proporcionar contra males prevenibles.”

Nuestros políticos de hoy hacen exactamente lo contrario. . Ellos promueven activamente un mal evitable.

But eighty years ago one man, Winston Churchill, was very clear about preventing a clear and present evil, Herr Hitler and the Nazis. Pero hace ochenta años, un hombre, Winston Churchill, fue muy claro sobre la prevención de un mal claro y presente, Herr Hitler y los nazis. But Churchill was a lone voice crying in the wind of appeasement, and the carnage that could have been avoided came with a vengeance. Pero Churchill era una voz solitaria que clama en el viento de apaciguamiento, y la carnicería que se podría haber evitado vino con una venganza.

And today Europe finds itself in much the same position. Y hoy en día Europa se encuentra en la misma posición. Even as Islam grows demographically, territorially, and militantly, it is promoted as the “religion of peace” by the same type of cowardly, careerist politicians who once appeased Hitler. A pesar de que el Islam crece demográficamente, territorial y militante, se promueve como la “religión de paz” por el mismo tipo de políticos cobardes, arribistas que, una vez apaciguado Hitler.

Islam was not the religion of peace to Winston Churchill. El Islam no es la religión de la paz a Winston Churchill. He described it as the religion of blood and war. Lo describió como la religión de la sangre y la guerra.

Anyone with a knowledge of the foundations and history of Islamic expansion knows this to be the truth. Cualquier persona con un conocimiento de los fundamentos y la historia de la expansión islámica sabe que se trata de la verdad.

Mohammed was a warlord. Mohammed era un señor de la guerra. And a very good warlord indeed. Y un señor de la guerra muy bueno. By the time of his death he had militarily defeated and converted most of the pagan and Christian tribes of the Arabian Peninsula. En el momento de su muerte, había derrotado militarmente y se convierte la mayoría de las tribus paganas y cristianas de la Península Arábiga.

After his death Islam rapidly expanded at the point of a sword, defeating ancient civilisations and overrunning continents as it did so. Después de su muerte, el Islam se expandió rápidamente en la punta de una espada, derrotando a las antiguas civilizaciones y continentes de rueda libre como lo hizo.

And today it is within Europe, it is within the West, and it is calling for what it has always called for: total Islamic domination. Y hoy está dentro de Europa, es en el Occidente, y es llamada por lo que siempre ha defendido: la dominación islámica total. And if we wish to resist, then they will use terror against us. Y si queremos resistir, entonces ellos usan el terror contra nosotros.

Yet still our treasonous politicians call it the “religion of peace”, and tell us that if we refuse to share such a fantastical and ridiculous notion, that if we choose to believe Winston Churchill’s argument that Islam is a religion of blood and war, then we will be sent to prison. Sin embargo, todavía nuestros políticos traidores llaman la “religión de paz”, y nos dicen que si nos negamos a compartir una idea fantástica y ridícula, que si elegimos creer argumento de Winston Churchill que el Islam es una religión de la sangre y la guerra, a continuación, vamos a ir a la cárcel.

Of course it is not a religion of peace. Por supuesto que no es una religión de paz. Its founder was a warrior, and the highest honour bestowed upon a Muslim is the promise of hordes of scented houris and an eternal leg-over in the after life, achievable not by being a good Samaritan, but by dying as a martyr in the physical battle to expand imperialist Islam. Su fundador fue un guerrero, y el más alto honor otorgado a un musulmán es la promesa de hordas de huríes perfumadas y un eterno pata más en la otra vida, no alcanzables por ser un buen samaritano, pero al morir como un mártir de la física batalla para ampliar imperialista Islam.

Islam literally means submission. Islam literalmente significa sumisión. What kind of a religion can possibly call itself submission? ¿Qué clase de religión, posiblemente, puede llamarse a sí misma presentación?

Islam divides the world into two spheres. El Islam divide al mundo en dos esferas. The House of Islam (submission) and the House of War. La Casa del Islam (sumisión) y la Casa de la Guerra. What kind of religion defines itself by military conquest? ¿Qué clase de religión se define por la conquista militar?

Yet our leaders tell us we cannot criticise Islam because it is a religion, whilst the organisation of the Islamic conference, in cahoots with the united nations is striving to make any criticism of Islam illegal. Sin embargo, nuestros líderes nos dicen que no puede criticar al Islam, porque es una religión, mientras que la organización de la Conferencia Islámica, en connivencia con las Naciones Unidas está tratando de hacer cualquier crítica al Islam ilegales.

But Islam is so much more than just a religion. Pero el Islam es mucho más que sólo una religión. It is a political, social, legal and structural blueprint which totally dominates a devout Muslim’s life, and wishes coincidentally to dominate all devout non-Muslims’ lives as well. Se trata de un proyecto político, social, legal y estructural que domina totalmente la vida de un musulmán devoto, y desea casualmente a dominar todos los devotos no musulmanes vidas.

It is profoundly illiberal and it is profoundly undemocratic. Es profundamente antiliberal y es profundamente antidemocrática. It does not believe in the man-made laws of democracy, preferring instead to adhere to the absolute word of Allah, as interpreted by an illiterate 7th-century desert dweller. No cree en las leyes hechas por el hombre de la democracia, prefiriendo en su lugar de adherirse a la palabra absoluta de Dios, según la interpretación de un habitante del desierto analfabetos del siglo séptimo.

And our politicians have imported this illiberal and undemocratic ideology into the liberal democracies than make up the West, and then they dare to criminalise us when we object to this! Y nuestros políticos han importado esta ideología liberal y democrático en las democracias liberales que componen el Oeste, y luego se atreven a tipificar como delito, cuando nos oponemos a esto!

But how can we not criticise Islam? Pero, ¿cómo no podemos criticar el Islam? Can our politicians really protect it as a religion and therefore place it out of legal reach? Puede realmente proteger a nuestros políticos que como una religión, por lo que el lugar fuera del alcance legal?

When homosexuals are hung from cranes, is this political Islam in action or religious Islam? Cuando los homosexuales se cuelgan de las grúas, este es el Islam político en la acción o religiosa el Islam?

When adulterous women are buried up to their shoulders in sand and stoned to death, is this political Islam or religious Islam? Cuando la mujer adúltera se entierran hasta los hombros en la arena y apedreada hasta la muerte, es este el Islam político o religioso del Islam?

When Muslims who wish to leave Islam are issued with death sentences, is this political Islam, or is this religious Islam? Cuando los musulmanes que desean abandonar el Islam se emiten con la pena de muerte, ¿es el Islam político, o se trata de religiosos del Islam?

When wives and daughters are slaughtered to protect their families’ honour by husbands fathers and uncles, is this political Islam or religious Islam? Cuando las esposas e hijas se sacrifican para proteger a las familias cumplir con sus maridos por los padres y tíos, ¿es el islam político o religioso del Islam?

If it is political, then it must be denounced as evil and barbaric. Si es político, entonces debe ser denunciado como el mal y la barbarie. If it religious, how can it possibly not be denounced as the same? Si religiosa, ¿cómo puede no ser denunciado como posiblemente lo mismo? What is evil is evil and what is barbaric is barbaric and cannot be exempted from criticism because it is sheltered by the word “religion”. Lo que es malo es malo y lo que es una barbaridad es una barbaridad y no pueden estar exentos de críticas, ya que está protegida por la palabra “religión”.

In criminalising free speech, our socialist leaders reveal their dictatorial ambition. En criminalizar la libertad de expresión, los dirigentes socialistas revelan su ambición dictatorial. The mark of a free society is freedom of speech. La marca de una sociedad libre es la libertad de expresión. To take this away is a totalitarian act, made all the worse because freedom of speech is our only defence in the peaceful opposition against the foreign totalitarian ideology of Islam. Para aprovechar esta distancia es un acto totalitario, que se ve empeorado por la libertad de expresión es nuestra única defensa en la oposición pacífica en contra de la ideología totalitaria extranjera del Islam.

And I hope this irony is not lost on you. Y espero que esta ironía no se pierde en ti. In order to protect and advance a foreign totalitarian ideology, our own rulers are prepared to adopt native totalitarian means to stop us defending our democracy and our freedom. Con el fin de proteger y promover una ideología totalitaria extranjera, nuestros propios gobernantes están dispuestos a adoptar nativa significa totalitario a detenernos defender nuestra democracia y nuestra libertad.

The West lives in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights. La vida de Occidente, de conformidad con el Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos. Islam does not. El Islam no. They signed up instead to the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam. Se inscribió en vez de la Declaración de El Cairo sobre Derechos Humanos en el Islam.

But they have a very important caveat: when sharia law collides with human rights law, guess which law prevails? Pero tienen una advertencia muy importante: cuando choca con la sharia la ley de derechos humanos, supongo que la ley prevalece?

Quite so. Tan. Sharia is the top trumps when it comes to human rights. La sharia es la parte superior triunfos en lo que respecta a los derechos humanos.

This is like a signatory to the Geneva convention murdering and torturing prisoners of war, and being given a pass at a war trial because it was “part of their religion.” Esto es como signatario de la Convención de Ginebra asesinar y torturar a los prisioneros de guerra, y se daban un pase en un juicio de guerra porque era “parte de su religión.”

And when our politicians today excuse Islam as a religion of peace and allow them to set the rules both at home, at the European Union, and at the United Nations, then our politicians are betraying their countries and they are betraying their people. Y cuando nuestra excusa hoy en día los políticos al Islam como una religión de paz y les permiten establecer las reglas, tanto en casa, en la Unión Europea, y en las Naciones Unidas, a continuación, nuestros políticos están traicionando a sus países y que están traicionando a su gente. They are committing treason. Ellos están cometiendo traición a la patria.

“Can one commit treason in a time of peace?” people may ask. “¿Se puede cometer traición a la patria en tiempos de paz?” La gente puede preguntar. But are we really at peace? Pero en realidad estamos en paz?

We may not consider ourselves at war with Islam, but Islam considers itself at war with us. No podemos considerarnos en guerra con el Islam, pero el Islam se considera en guerra con nosotros.

And it is a war we are losing. Y es una guerra que estamos perdiendo. Territorially, demographically, politically, and democratically. En el ámbito territorial, demográfica, política y democráticamente.

In fact, it is a war of aggression on two fronts. De hecho, es una guerra de agresión en dos frentes. Radical Islam on the one, and left-wing treason on the other. El islamismo radical en el uno, y la traición de la izquierda por el otro.

Our children are told to celebrate multiculturalism and Islam, without being told the real history of violent expansionist Islam. Nuestros niños se les dice para celebrar el multiculturalismo y el Islam, sin que se contó la historia real de la violencia de expansión del Islam.

Instead, they are told that their own history, their religion, their culture, their traditions, their very being, is just a litany of imperialism, racism, murder and slavery. En su lugar, se les dice que su propia historia, su religión, su cultura, sus tradiciones, su propio ser, es sólo una letanía del imperialismo, el racismo, el asesinato y la esclavitud. This is a proven psychological technique designed to render an enemy helpless, or to quote Alexander Solzhenitsyn, “in order to destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.” Esta es una técnica probada psicológicas diseñadas para hacer que un enemigo indefenso, o para citar a Alexander Solzhenitsyn, “con el fin de destruir a un pueblo, primero debe cortar sus raíces”.

Any government that does this to its own people, to its own children, is a government that deserves, manifestly deserves, to be overthrown. Cualquier gobierno que hace esto para su propio pueblo, a sus propios hijos, es un gobierno que se merece, evidentemente merece, al ser derrocado.

Can anyone really argue that a government that praises the foreign invader whilst psychologically and legally stripping away the defences of its people is a government that is not guilty of treason? ¿Puede alguien realmente sostienen que un gobierno que alaba al invasor extranjero, mientras que psicológicamente y legalmente quitando las defensas de su pueblo es un gobierno que no es culpable de traición a la patria?

Now here we come to a more uplifting part of this depressing monologue, because in this part of the battle we are advancing. Y aquí llegamos a una parte más estimulante de este monólogo deprimente, porque en esta parte de la batalla que estamos avanzando. Slowly, admittedly, but relentlessly, and I think we are now unstoppable. Poco a poco, es cierto, pero sin descanso, y creo que estamos ya imparable.

Geert Wilders here in the Netherlands, René Stadtkewitz in Germany, whose immediate popularity caused Angela Merkel to make an abrupt U-turn and denounce Multiculturalism. Geert Wilders en Holanda, Stadtkewitz René en Alemania, cuya causa inmediata popularidad, Angela Merkel, para hacer un brusco giro en U y denunciar multiculturalismo.

The Sweden Democrats, Heinz-Christian Strache in Austria, the Swiss People’s Party, and in England we await a political movement to pick up the baton from the rapidly growing English Defence League. Los Demócratas de Suecia, Heinz-Christian Strache, en Austria, el Partido del Pueblo Suizo, y en Inglaterra la espera de un movimiento político para recoger el testigo de la creciente población de la Liga de Defensa Inglés.

And that growth can only accelerate. Y que el crecimiento sólo puede acelerar. As more and more people become aware of Islam and become aware of the depth of treason perpetrated by their liberal rulers, and most importantly, as people lose their fear of being labelled a racist — which was a label specifically designed to strip us of resistance against a racially designated invader who uses race as a weapon. A medida que más y más conciencia del Islam y tomar conciencia de la profundidad de la traición perpetrada por sus gobernantes liberales, y lo más importante, ya que la gente pierda el miedo a ser tachado de racista – que fue una etiqueta diseñada específicamente para despojarnos de la resistencia contra un invasor racial designado que utiliza la raza como un arma.

In fact, let us deal with this “racist” label right now. De hecho, vamos a hacer frente a esta “racista” la etiqueta en este momento. It is not racist to defend your country against an obvious and growing threat. No es racista para defender su país contra una amenaza evidente y creciente. It is not racist to defend your culture, your heritage, and your traditions. No es racista para defender su cultura, su patrimonio y sus tradiciones. It is not racist to work to ensure a democratic future for your children and grandchildren. No es racista a trabajar para asegurar un futuro democrático para sus hijos y nietos.

If you choose not to defend your country, your culture and the democratic future of your children, then you may well pat yourselves on the back in your non-racist champagne socialist cocktail bars in Islington; you may well love other people’s anti-racist credentials almost as much as you love your own; but there is no getting away from the label I have for you. Si usted opta por no defender a su país, su cultura y el futuro democrático de sus hijos, entonces es muy posible palmaditas a sí mismos en la parte posterior de tu bares de champán no racista cóctel socialista en Islington, que bien puede el amor credenciales contra de otras personas-racista casi tanto como usted ama a su propio, pero no hay alejarse de la etiqueta que tengo para ti.

You are a traitor and a betrayer of your country, a betrayer of your culture, and a betrayer of our yet unborn children. Usted es un traidor y un traidor de su país, un traidor de su cultura, y un traidor a nuestros hijos aún no nacidos.

And you are a racist, indeed a genocidal racist. Y tú eres un racista, de hecho un racista genocida. Young native Europeans will become a demographic ethnic minority within their own homelands if immigration rates and birth rates stay the way they are for just one more generation. Los jóvenes europeos nativos se convertirán en una minoría demográfica étnicos dentro de sus propios países si las tasas de inmigración y las tasas de natalidad estancia la forma en que son sólo para una generación más.

This can politely be called population replacement. Esta cortesía se puede llamar reemplazo de la población. More crudely, it is bloodless genocide. Más crudamente, que es un genocidio sin derramamiento de sangre.

The United Nations is very clear on this. Las Naciones Unidas es muy clara en esto. Their definition of genocide is as follows. Su definición de genocidio es la siguiente. Quote. Cita.

Article 2. El artículo 2.

In the present convention genocide means any of the acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part , a national, racial or religious group. En la presente Convención, el genocidio significa cualquiera de los actos perpetrados con la intención de destruir, total o parcialmente, a un, racial o religioso nacional.

We have been betrayed. Hemos sido traicionados.

And one of the saddest aspects of this betrayal is the effect it has had on those old ex-warriors who fought for their countries in recent living memory. Y uno de los aspectos más tristes de esta traición es el efecto que ha tenido en los antiguos ex-guerreros que lucharon por sus países en la memoria viva de los últimos.

Ex-Spitfire pilot Alex Henshaw died three years ago. Ex-piloto de Spitfire Alex Henshaw murió hace tres años. He was acutely aware of the political betrayal of his country. Él era muy consciente de la traición política de su país. He said: Él dijo:

“I feel extreme emotional sadness for the young men I knew that gave their lives willingly for a cause in which we all believed. “Siento una tristeza extrema emocional para los jóvenes sabía que dieron su vida voluntariamente por una causa en la que todos creíamos. And I often say to myself that if those young boys would come down now and walk through the villages, through the towns and through the cities and look around and see what is happening to us, they would say somewhere along the line we have been betrayed.” Y a menudo me digo a mí mismo que si esos chicos jóvenes que baje ahora y caminar por los pueblos, a través de las ciudades ya través de las ciudades y mirar alrededor y ver lo que está sucediendo a nosotros, que diría algún lugar a lo largo de la línea que hemos sido traicionados . “

Yes, Mr. Henshaw, I am afraid you have, and all of you socialist/liberal/left-wing people need to know what you have done. Sí, señor Henshaw, me temo que usted tiene, y todos ustedes socialista / liberal / ala gente dejó saber lo que has hecho.

You need to take a walk around your cities, towns and villages, take a look at the hundreds of thousand of graves standing as testament to the ultimate sacrifice made by our young men in order that you may live in a liberal democracy today. Usted necesita tomar un paseo por sus ciudades, pueblos y aldeas, echar un vistazo a los cientos de miles de tumbas en pie como testimonio del sacrificio hecho por nuestros jóvenes con el fin de que puedan vivir en una democracia liberal en la actualidad.

You need to understand that this a not just betrayal, but a triple betrayal: Es necesario comprender que esta no sólo una traición, sino una traición triple:

  • The betrayal of all our old soldiers whose sacrifice granted us freedom, La traición de todos nuestros viejos soldados cuyo sacrificio nos concedió la libertad,
  • The betrayal of my generation who you threaten to imprison if we defend our inherited freedom, and La traición de mi generación que te amenazan con encarcelar si defendemos nuestra libertad heredada, y
  • The betrayal of our yet unborn, who, unless we stop it seem set to inherit a country racked with tribal and religious hatred, which must inevitably lead to a continental scale multicultural war that will make the break-up of Yugoslavia look like a bun-fight. La traición de nuestro aún no han nacido, que, a menos que deje de parecer conjunto de heredar un país atormentado por el odio tribal y religiosa, que debe llevar inevitablemente a una guerra a gran escala continental multicultural que hará que el desmembramiento de Yugoslavia mirada como un bollo- lucha.

And, of course, it is also the betrayal of freedom and democracy. Y, por supuesto, también es la traición de la libertad y la democracia.

Because freedom and democracy did not just magically appear. Porque la libertad y la democracia no sólo aparece mágicamente. They evolved over two and a half thousand years, rooted in Greco-Roman Judeo-Christian ancestry. Su evolución fue más de dos mil quinientos años, sus raíces en grecorromana ascendencia judeo-cristiana. And were fought for and defended with much blood and sacrifice. Y se luchó y defendió con mucha sangre y sacrificio.

Democracy and freedom are not the personal possessions of socialist politicians to be handed away, without our agreement, to the descendants of a 7th century desert warlord, who view our attachment to democracy as just a weakness to be used against us. La democracia y la libertad no son las posesiones personales de los políticos socialistas que se entregó de inmediato, sin nuestro consentimiento, a los descendientes de un señor de la guerra del desierto del siglo séptimo, que ven nuestro apego a la democracia sólo como una debilidad para ser utilizado en contra nuestra.

I do not blame Islam. No culpo al Islam. Fundamentalist Muslims are just doing what it says in the book. Los musulmanes fundamentalistas son sólo haciendo lo que dice en el libro.

But I do blame our politicians. Pero yo culpo a nuestros políticos. There are two sides in this civilisational stand-off, and our politicians have sided with the enemy. Hay dos lados en esta civilización stand-off, y nuestros políticos se han aliado con el enemigo.

So I say to them: Así que yo les digo:

You may well hold the levers of power at the moment, but we are on the rise and we are unstoppable. Usted también puede tener las palancas del poder en este momento, pero van en aumento y que son imparables. Do you seriously think you can do what you have done to your own people without repercussion? ¿De verdad crees que puedes hacer lo que han hecho a su propio pueblo sin repercusión?

You could stop this now if you chose to, by the simple expedient of putting the interests of your own people before the interests of Islam. Usted puede parar esto ahora si elige, por el simple expediente de poner los intereses de su propio pueblo a los intereses del Islam.

But you won’t do that will you? Pero no lo hará usted? So you put us in an almost impossible position. Así que nos puso en una posición casi imposible. If we do nothing we must accept our children and grandchildren will one day live under sharia law. Si no hacemos nada tenemos que aceptar a nuestros hijos y nietos vivirán un día en virtud de la sharia.

And if we do something, then it must by definition be revolutionary. Y si no hacemos algo, entonces por definición, debe ser revolucionario. But we did not start this. Pero no comenzamos esto. You did. Tú lo hiciste. Most of us would have been quite happy to mow the lawn, hold down a mundane job, and pay our taxes. La mayoría de nosotros habría sido muy feliz para cortar el césped, mantener un trabajo mundano, y pagar nuestros impuestos.

You have made us revolutionaries. Usted nos ha hecho revolucionarios. And whilst your behaviour suggests you fear Islam more than you fear us, let me tell you something, you lying, betraying, treacherous, socialist careerists: Y si bien su comportamiento sugiere que el miedo al Islam más de lo que nos temen, déjame decirte algo, mintiendo, traicionando, arribistas traidores, socialista:

We might not hold power today, but given another decade, we will, and then we will hold you to account. Puede que no detentan el poder hoy en día, pero teniendo en cuenta una década más, lo haremos, y luego le rindan cuentas. You will appear before a Nuremberg-style court, and you will be tried for treason, and you will be tried for crimes against humanity, and for the first time in a very long time you will be answerable to us! Usted deberá comparecer ante un tribunal al estilo de Nuremberg, y será juzgado por traición a la patria, y que será juzgado por crímenes de lesa humanidad, y por primera vez en mucho tiempo en que usted será responsable ante nosotros!

Die extremistischen britische Medien aus Amsterdam

Liebe Freunde, wenn wir uns gestern vermisst habt, dann könnt ihr wissen: Wir waren auch im Amsterdam. Und von dem her können wir euch sagen: Die Berichte, die die britischen Medien sich so beeilten zu verbreiten, sind falsch und propagandistisch stark angefärbt. Ihr sieht unten, sie haben sich bereits im Vorfeld geeilt, die Islamkritiker als “far right” (Ultrarechte) abzustempeln. Dabei bedienten sie den Ausdruck pauschal, ohne die Zusammensetzung der Teilnehmer zu beachten.

Wir, die dabei waren, werden euch heute im Laufe des Tages einige Berichte und Fotos liefern. Einiges vielleicht auch hier, aber alles wichtige Material werdet ihr bei PI finden können.

Hoffentlich zeigt ihr auch ein wenig Toleranz gegenüber uns, denn wir (die Teilnehmer aus den verschiedenen deutschen Städten) haben eine sehr anstrengende Fahrt hinter uns und wir wollen dennoch zusehen, dass ihr möglichst schnell, und möglichst hautnahe die Berichte bekommt.

sky news

Hundreds of people are expected to attend the demonstration, with members of the English Weiterlesen »

sky news

Hundreds of people are expected to attend the demonstration, with members of the English Defence League (EDL) also invited by their Dutch counterparts.

Authorities moved the rally from a city centre location to an industrial site on the outskirts of Amsterdam for fear of violence.

“We are not aggressors, we are peaceful people who care about democracy and our country,” a spokesman for the European Freedom Initiative told Sky News.

Frau Merkel antes del fin de semana se desdijo. La menopausica quiere mas inmigrantes tomateros en Alemania

Previous posts by Paul Weston:

2007 Jan 22 The Week Britain Died
26 Britain’s Dystopian School Children
Feb 2 Questioning the Sanity of Liberals
Mar 1 Multiculturalism — Merits and Debits
31 Is European Civil War Inevitable by 2025?
Jun 26 The Big Story That Isn’t
Aug 10 An Open Letter to Fellow Europeans
24 A Brussels Perspective
Sep 12 Democratic Europe R.I.P.
Nov 2 The Coming Third World War
21 Cool War — Warm War — Hot War: Part 1
29 Cool War — Warm War — Hot War: Part 2
2008 Mar 27 The Face of Moderate Islam in Britain
2009 Feb 9 Wilders in Wonderland
13 Who is Lord Ahmed?
25 Temporary Peace Trumps Freedom of Speech
Jul 1 Muslims, Mosques and Mosquitoes
2 Islam, the BBC, and Young Children
8 Review of “A Bridge Too Far”
17 Socialist Propaganda in British Education
Oct 15 Multiculturalism Has Destroyed the British Police
2010 Mar 16 Ethnically Cleansing the English
Oct 7 Banana Republic Britain 

 

Quiere ganar Obama las elecciones con el AS del terrorísmo?

WaPo: Terrorist Plots an ‘October Surprise’?

Concluye que la amenaza terrorista es poco probable que sea un tema electoral.   ¿Está de acuerdo?  A

“Medios de Comunicación informan de que varios paquetes sospechosos fueron sacados de aviones de carga hoy ésto pone el terrorismo – o por lo menos el terrorismo potencial – en primer plano, pero es probable que tenga sólo un efecto marginal en el panorama político de cuatro días que quedan antes de las elecciones del 2 de noviembre.

La historia ha dominado las noticias por cable durante todo el día y casi con seguridad será un tema principal en el noticiero de la noche, una historia de primera plana en todos los periódicos importantes y un punto central de la charla en la blogosfera.

Eso significa que las cuestiones de terrorismo estaran  más en las mentes de los votantes del mañana ya  que nadie asume cuando comenzó hoy. Y, todo lo que capta la atención nacional tan cerca de una elección es digna de mención y encaja perfectamente en la idea de una “Sorpresa de Octubre”, un acontecimiento de última hora que cambia el curso de una elección.

Con esto dicho, hay poca evidencia de que el terrorismo se convierta en un tema de votación para un público muy centrado en la economía y otros asuntos domésticos. “

The Cargo Planes Terrorist Threat: Dry Runs, or Failed Administration?

Con toda la atención que se está reproduciendo en la radio y cámaras de red sobre el ataque de los dryrum se supone a través de paquetes de UPS en los vuelos, he estado trabajando los «tubos de información, para obtener una lectura diferente de lo que está probable pasando.

ups-610x

. Estábamos especialmente en la búsqueda de cualquier cosa que pudiera llamar la atención especial y pueden afectar a las elecciones y los resultados . Esto tendría SERIOS efectos perjudiciales sobre países enteros, en su caso, y casi imposible de evitar.

En 2004, y a través del 2008, Irak fue el punto central. Dado que el combate activo que estaba pasando, y que había cerca de 200 mil soldados en la zona, cualquier intento serio contra los EEUU y la coalición y / o Irak probablemente molesto , giraba la  seguridad en torno a las elecciones y la unidad de la gente las urnas, especialmente en los ’04 y ’08 en el Estado Mayor Presidencial. Si usted recuerda, la revista The Lancet produjo un “estudio” que pretendía demostrar que los EE.UU. habían matado a más de 800k civiles iraquíes, por desgracia para ellos, sus momento fue terrible y no produjo el efecto deseado cuando lo quería. En las operaciones de la percepción del público (IO? Psyops?) el tiempo es realmente todo.

En el caso de lo que está ocurriendo hoy en día, las notas que tengo y conversaciones que he escuchado están pidiendo algunas cosas en tela de juicio. Para eso, hay que concluir que existe la posibilidad de que este evento o serie de eventos son impulsados o motivados políticamente . Teniendo en cuenta que las próximas elecciones del martes estan  tan desequilibradas en las encuestas, y que las consecuencias son tan malas para la administración (hey, yo no estoy haciendo esta predicción-que acaba de leer la noticia), existe la posibilidad, por remota , alguien que no sea AQ esté haciendo  el trabajo aquí.

Por un lado, los informes estaban diciendo que los paquetes  están vinculados  a  personas AQ / grupos en Yemen tan pronto después de los intentos de hacer que uno de ellos fuera  sospechoso. “Esto es demasiado limpio” me han dicho, demasiado fácil de rastrear-como fuera un episodio de la serie de TV de envuelto Ley y Orden.

AQ o los talibanes no querrían desperdiciar recursos en un “simulacro” de esta magnitud. Si realmente se necesita para “probar” esto, que acaba de enviar CD’s, o algo totalmente inocuo.

 

C ¿Será para que el presidente Obama tenga  su base del  más mediocre ‘apoyo en la cabecera de  las urnas? Yo no estoy poniendo esto a nadie pasado en el administrador o los de apoyo de él. Es muy fácil de hacer . Es casi como los  de Al Qaeda chicos en el trabajo  están tratando de quedar atrapados, lo cual, si este era el “verdadero negocio” o incluso un plazo seco, no se han hecho tan evidentes.

No estoy diciendo que nuestros muchachos de guardia no estaban haciendo su trabajo y esto era algo fácil de hacer-no sirree. Lo que estoy diciendo es que requiere mucho menos esfuerzo que otros intentos en el pasado, y se descubrió más bien desde ya-a través de el mundo.

A secondary thought is that AQ was looking for the ‘Spanish Effect’ here.  Back in 2004, Spain’s elections turned quite different due to the train attacks.  AQ is likely looking to play the same cards here.  But will it work?  WOULD it work? Un pensamiento secundario es que la amenaza   looking for the ‘Spanish Effect’ aquí. En el 2004, las elecciones de España se volvieron muy diferentes debido a los ataques terroristas del tren. AQ es probable está buscando para jugar las mismas cartas aquí. Pero, ¿funciona? ¿Funcionaría ?

Vamos a ver y ver cómo se desarrollan los acontecimientos en las encuestas, usted puede apostar que habrá algunas nuevas preguntas insertas en su encuesta de llamadas a través del fin de semana, sobre el terrorísmo -y ‘ verás lo que hace el martes.

. Voy a tener más el lunes.

Dem. Candidate for Ohio Treasurer Has Ties to Extremists

Si bien la noticia este ciclo electoral se ha centrado en las carreras de caballos y personalidades de alto voltaje como Sharron Angle y Christine O’Donnell, una de las carreras más importantes del país se ha deslizado por debajo del radar nacional, a pesar del hecho de que uno de los principales figuras que participan tiene la mala costumbre de mezclarse con los extremistas islámicos.

En el estado barómetro crucial de Ohio, hay dos de  los candidatos a cuadrar de tesorero del estado y las apuestas son muy altas. Los Demócratas están desesperados por derrotar a los republicanos, el representante estatal Josh Mandel , un veterano de la Marina a quien muchos observadores ven como una gran estrella en la toma después de que él ayudó a encabezar el esfuerzo por desprenderse de los fondos de pensiones de Ohio de las compañías que hacen negocios en el sector energético iraní.

370o5i32

 

. Pero la obsesión con los demócratas golpeando de Mandel significa que están apoyando titular Tesorero Kevin Boyce , cuya competencia y la ética han sido cuestionados por los medios de medios de comunicación.

George Soros, respaldado por el Progreso de la mayoría, un estilo de grupo moveon.org-style,  que se centra en las contiendas estatales y locales, ha mirado más allá de estos problemas e hizo de Boyce su principal candidato de este ciclo.

Backing Boyce  significa algo más que apoyar a un candidato imperfecto, sin embargo, como él ha entregado el control de su oficina a través de su miembro del personal superior, Tesorero Adjunto Amer Ahmed, quien tiene la costumbre de colgarse  alrededor de personas que son bien conocidos por sus vínculos con los radicales islámicos y los terroristas. Ahmad lo hace de acuerdo a   su capacidad profesional, así como en su vida personal, la elección de asistir a una mezquita infame cerca de Columbus, Ohio.

Palestinos destruyen el Golgota y la Tumba de Jesús para colocar sus fiambres.

Palestinian Muslims are building an illegal wall over Jesus’ Garden Tomb

Ellos también están construyendo en la cima del Gólgota, un importante sitio sagrado cristiano.

Esto, además de destruir los rastros de la historia judía en todo el-Aqsa en Jerusalén y al profanar la Iglesia de la Natividad en Belén. Ground Zero Victory Mosque, here they come.Sin ambargo los cristianos del lugar siguen prefiriendo a los musulmanes antes que a los judíos.

Palabras de un cristiano:

“Creemos muchos de nosotros que Jesus está aún subido a una cruz rodeado de millares de palestinos ,crucificados,rodeándolo.Necesitamos gentes dotadas de discernimietno para que vean las centenas de millares de cruces en todo el país,los Palestinos ,hombres,mujeres y niños crucificados.La Palestina se ha convertido en un inmenso Gólgota.El programa crucificatorio de Israel funciona a diario.Palestina se ha convertido en un inmenso Calvario.”

.El Papa dijo:Por primera vez estarán presentes en Roma todos los obispos y patriarcas de las regiones que van desde Egipto hasta Irán,habra miembros de la Iglesia Ortodoxa ,vendrán invitados de los ayatollajs iranis.El MO cuenta con casi tres millones de católicos y 4 de cristianos.El Sínodo ,ha observado el papa: “es una ocasión propicia para continuar constructivamente el diálogo con los hebreos…”(?!)

.Marco Robin.

Quieren acabar con nosotros,así de claro.

.Yona Metzger,Gran rabino de Israel:

“LOS DEL VATICANO NO TIENEN NINGUN DERECHO A QUERER ENSEÑARNOS  COMO INTERPRETAR LA BIBLIA.

NOSOTROS NO LES ENSEÑAMOS COMO INTERPRETAR SU NUEVO TESTAMENTO”.

Al Bretaña: Todo queda en familia. Estudiante de post-grado árabe, demanda a la Universidad de Durham, por racísmo. La insultó y maltrató su tutor árabe.

HUH? Arab student sues university after being called a “bloody Arab” by another Arab

Una estudiante de posgrado del Reino Unido, el Dr. Hadil Bakir, quien alega que fue calificada “una sangrienta árabe por su profesor de doctorado, el Dr. Rumaisa Bashir (en la foto) en la Universidad de Durham, está demandando a la universidad por $ 320.000.

UK DAILY MAIL Dr Hadil Bakirdice que ella fue verbal y físicamente abusada por su supervisor, mientras estudiaba en la university’s world-leading department of human molecular genetics. La víctima originaria de Irak, dijo que el Dr. Bashir Rumaisa la sometió a una campaña de acoso que la llevó a su bulimia en desarrollo, a una úlcera de estómago y la depresión.

(Ahora aquí está el problema) un formulario de reclamación presentada ante el tribunal, dijo: “Durante este período, el Dr. Bashir utilizaba regularmente la frase” los árabes son sangrientos de  ‘origen. El Dr. Bashir es paquistaní. lA reclamante es de Irak. “

. Ella está demandando a la universidad debido a que el personal directivo no hizo nada, para protegerla de la supuesta intimidación del Dr. Bashir, un experto mundial en la aparición en el adulto de distrofia muscular que también ha trabajado en la Universidad de Newcastle.

Dr. Bakir, de Durham, dijo que había sido incapaz de trabajar debido a su mala salud desde que completó su doctorado en septiembre de 2006.

La Universidad de Durham ha negado las afirmaciones hechas durante una audiencia en la Corte del Condado de Newcastle. El tribunal escuchó los problemas que comenzaron para el estudiante extranjero poco después de que comenzó sus estudios en octubre del 2002.

She was dubbed a ‘cry baby’ and ‘international troublemaker’ después de haber dicho que zanjara  su título de la tesis original y se hiciera hacerse cargo del trabajo previamente realizado por otro estudiante, el tribunal escuchó. A partir de ahí sufrió una campaña de abusos a manos del Dr. Bashir, que utilizaba  lenguaje soez hacia ella y menospreciaba su trabajo, afirmó.

Dijo que también fue abusada físicamente por el Dr. Bashir, quien está acusado de haberla  empujado en el  pasado, pisado los dedos del pie, y golpeado contra una puerta de la nevera con la cabeza. H / T Lee S

Geert Wilders: Juicio al Islam. Testimonio completo del Profesor Hans Jansen

[traduction collective] Le témoignage de Hans Jansen au procès Wilders.

El testimonio es de  Hans Jansen [foto],Profesor universitario y doctor en lengua árabe y estudios islamicos (se mere4ce un premio por haberse dedicado a ese bodrio) uno de los mayores especialistas en los Países Bajos. . [notice Wikipedia]

Texte de la video 1

[00:00:00.000]    The expert witness has declared as follows:
[00:00:07.000]    “My name is Johanes Julliaan Gijsbert Jansen, born November 17, 1942, living in Amsterdam, retired”.
[00:00:16.000]    He has submitted a CV which is attached to the hearing and he says in a footnote to it:
[00:00:24.000]    “I was a professor in Utrecht from 2003-2008. With the editing of the Kramers’ Quran
[00:00:32.000]    translation, I mean annotating, removing errors, and so on”.
[00:00:37.000]    This is another footnote of the CV. It seems clearer to me if I pick that up first,
[00:00:42.000]    and also read that out. [Moszkowicz: “Please”]
[00:00:47.000]    “Professor doctor Hans Jansen is an Arabist; he studied Arabic and Semitic languages
[00:00:53.000]    in Amsterdam, Leiden and Cairo. The common thread throughout his career
[00:00:59.000]    is the study of religion in general and Islam in particular.
[00:01:05.000]    He is one of the few Islam-watchers in the Netherlands who dares to look without rose-tinted glasses
[00:01:12.000]    at recent developments within Islam. At the University of Utrecht,
[00:01:17.000]    he was a professor of contemporary Islamic thought.
[00:01:22.000]    He also worked at the Universities of Leiden and Groningen.
[00:01:27.000]    From 1991 to 1997, he was a member of the National Advisory Council for Development Cooperation,
[00:01:34.000]    and participated in the controversy over the meaning and meaninglessness of international aid.
[00:01:42.000]    In addition to his academic career, he engaged in numerous ancillary activities in the Middle East,
[00:01:47.000]    including for the Red Cross in Iraq in 1990. He has visited almost all countries
[00:01:52.000]    in the Middle East for longer or shorter periods, and resided for almost four years in Cairo,
[00:01:58.000]    where he led the Dutch Institute from 1979 to 1982.
[00:02:06.000]    He wrote among other things a well-noted biography of Muhammad, which was translated into German,
[00:02:12.000]    and a standard work on the ideology and theology behind the 1981 assassination
[00:02:18.000]    of Egyptian President Sadat. His books are not only translated into German,
[00:02:23.000]    but also in Yugoslav, Turkish, and Indonesian.
[00:02:28.000]    He has published articles in including [newspapers/magazines] De Volkskrant, Trouw,
[00:02:32.000]    HP/De Tijd and the now defunct weekly Opinio.
[00:02:37.000]    His book ‘Islam for pigs, monkeys, donkeys and other beasts’ became a modest bestseller
[00:02:44.000]    in the Netherlands in 2008. The peculiar title of this book is derived from the Koran,
[00:02:51.000]    which for Muslims is considered the literal word of God, in which non-Muslims are defined with these animal names.
[00:03:00.000]    In 1992 he edited an edition of the authoritative Quran translation of Prof. Kramers.”
[00:03:08.000]    Jansen is also a popular commentator on radio and TV programs
[00:03:13.000]    such as Nova, Pouw and Witteman, and RTL News.
[00:03:18.000]    And on his website you can find the list of publications and an abbreviated CV.
[00:03:26.000]    With regard to the Quran translation, Mr. Jansen said in the hearing:
[00:03:35.000]    “With the editing of the Quran translation of Kramers, I mean annotating, removing errors, etc.
[00:03:42.000]    Kramers wrote this work without having access to the scientific works one should have.
[00:03:50.000]    I tried to edit his translation in such way as he himself would have preferred
[00:03:54.000]    if he had had access to all works”.
[00:04:00.000]    Then he is asked about any possible connections to Mr. Wilders, and he says:
[00:04:08.000]    “I know Geert Wilders. The first time I met him he was a member of the VVD fraction,
[00:04:16.000]    A member of the Foreign Committee of Parliament. This committee had consulted
[00:04:20.000]    a number of experts on religion and politics.
[00:04:24.000]    I have met Wilders over the past ten years about 4 to 6 times.
[00:04:29.000]    That was about everything. I can remember one time he asked me whether I knew
[00:04:33.000]    a suitable Muslim who was willing to talk with him about Islam.
[00:04:39.000]    Wilders has sometimes called me and I responded to questions he then asked.
[00:04:43.000]    I can’t remember what those questions were and don’t know what he has done with my answers.
[00:04:50.000]    I’m regularly called by journalists and politicians with questions on matters concerning Islam.
[00:04:57.000]    For example where a particular verse in the Koran is. I answer them.
[00:05:05.000]    In answer to a question by the Prosecutor, who points at a letter from Mr. Pestman
[00:05:09.000]    of April 20, 2010, ‘whether I have participated in the creation of the movie Fitna.’
[00:05:16.000]    That I don’t know. I do not know what people do with the answers I give them.
[00:05:22.000]    Wilders has asked me where in the Koran it says that infidels must be slain,
[00:05:27.000]    or that they are pigs. I do not know whether he has used my answers for Fitna.
[00:05:33.000]    At the least, Wilders did not ask me to advise him for the movie.
[00:05:38.000]    I was also been questioned about this by Twan Huys [Dutch TV]; he also insinuated this.
[00:05:44.000]    I’m angry about that. This morning there was an article in De Volkskrant
[00:05:49.000]    about me and my link to Wilders. I express my amazement that people think
[00:05:54.000]    I will be lying today because I talked with Wilders once.
[00:06:00.000]    Mr. Moszkowicz tells me this letter states there exists a link between me and Mr. Wilders
[00:06:05.000]    via The International Free Press Society in Denmark.
[00:06:10.000]    I did not even know that Wilders had something to do with this organization,
[00:06:14.000]    until I read it this morning in De Volkskrant. Lars Hedegaard has asked me
[00:06:20.000]    to be on the advisory board of this organization.
[00:06:24.000]    I did that, but I never developed any activity within this organization.
[00:06:31.000]    The Magistrate tells me that he looked up that press release on the Internet.
[00:06:37.000]    Under the press release, separate from this article, is a list of names of the Board of Advisors,
[00:06:43.000]    with my name. I’ve never seen this press release.
[00:06:48.000]    I also never signed a call to support Wilders.
[00:06:53.000]    The Magistrate tells me that on the Internet it is possible to click further
[00:06:57.000]    to support the petition. I certainly have not done that.
[00:07:03.000]    Simon Admiraal” — the next expert, who also is heard by the Magistrate —
[00:07:09.000]    “was a doctoral student of mine, from 2004 to 2008, at Utrecht University.
[00:07:16.000]    I agreed with him not to see each other for a while in connection with this case.
[00:07:22.000]    Ms. Sultan” — the third expert who has been heard — “I do not know personally.
[00:07:27.000]    I have read her book and I watched the broadcast on Al-Jazeera”.
[00:07:34.000]    Until here on the background and contacts of Mr. Jansen,
[00:07:39.000]    and then the hearing continues on the contents. The title reads:
[00:07:46.000]    “About the statements Wilders had made, as included in the summons.
[00:07:52.000]    You [the Magistrate] ask me if I come across quotes that are not true.
[00:08:01.000]    There are tens of thousands of books, says Mr. Jansen, who say the same things,
[00:08:05.000]    and some of those things are controversial.”
[00:08:09.000]    And thenceforth [I have to take a zip of water] questions of Mr. Moszkowicz…
[00:08:13.000]
[00:08:21.000]    Then questions of Mr. Moszkowicz based on the individual citations
[00:08:25.000]    in the subpoena, and here are briefly described.
[00:08:31.000]    On questions by Mr. Moszkowicz, page 2, last quote: “Islam wants to dominate” till “civilization.”
[00:08:40.000]    Mr. Jansen replies: “Muhammad, 570-632 AD, said ‘I have been commanded
[00:08:50.000]    to make war against the people until they testify there is no God but Allah
[00:08:54.000]    and that Muhammad is Allah’s messenger. Only by speaking out with this confession
[00:09:00.000]    may they make their goods and blood untouchable for me’.
[00:09:05.000]    That means you may not just take it away. There is no imam who will refute this statement.
[00:09:15.000]    Also if you turn on the Dutch Muslim Broadcaster, you will hear this.
[00:09:20.000]    From the pulpit, this phrase is often proclaimed. I also point at the Quran, Sura 9:29,
[00:09:28.000]    which states that war must be waged to prohibit what God and his Messenger have forbidden.
[00:09:34.000]    From these texts indeed speaks the will to dominate.
[00:09:39.000]    I also refer in this context to a leading book, ‘Reliance of the Traveller’, in this is stated
[00:09:46.000]    that it is a duty for every Muslim to join the war, until Islam triumphs.
[00:09:53.000]    In numerous sermons, even in the Netherlands, it is said that Western civilization is evil and corrupt
[00:10:01.000]    and needs to be overthrown. Islam is proud of the destruction of earlier civilizations
[00:10:06.000]    such as Christianity in the Middle East and the Zoroastrian civilization [in Persia].
[00:10:11.000]    The theme ‘destruction’ often appears in the Quran, the Sharia handbooks, and standard works of Islam.
[00:10:19.000]    All unbelieving societies must be transformed. If it is not by the Quran, then with the stick.
[00:10:26.000]    You must consult an imam for the location of this last quote.
[00:10:31.000]    I read it first in a Sufi magazine in Egypt, the quote is attributed to Caliph Osman”.
[00:10:40.000]    Then another quote that is shown by Mr. Moszkowicz, and that is Fact 1, the first quote:
[00:10:49.000]    “Moderate Islam does not exist”. Response by Mr. Jansen: “That is correct.
[00:10:56.000]    There are moderate Muslims, but no moderate Islam.
[00:11:00.000]    The content of Islam is established. This cannot be altered.
[00:11:04.000]    The public prosecutor asks whether I can say something about the percentage
[00:11:08.000]    of moderate Muslims in the Netherlands. There was an American study, the Pew Survey
[00:11:15.000]    by, among others, Dr. Esposito. He surveyed Muslims worldwide.
[00:11:22.000]    This study shows approximately 20% of all Muslims take all Islamic rules literally and seriously.
[00:11:28.000]    60% have other things to do, but agree with Islam. This is called the ‘Silent Majority’.
[00:11:37.000]    The remaining 20% wants to turn away, but dares not, out of fear of reprisals.
[00:11:43.000]    It is difficult to distill realistic information from the survey”, says Mr. Jansen.
[00:11:49.000]    “Many respondents are reserved. In this survey was a question on whether the attacks
[00:11:54.000]    on September 11, 2001 were carried out by Jews or by Muslims.
[00:11:59.000]    The majority said ‘by Jews’. Many respondents indicated an understanding for these attacks”.
[00:12:07.000]    Then another part of a quote is shown to Mr. Jansen:
[00:12:13.000]    “There is no distinction between good Islam and bad Islam.” Mr. Jansen:
[00:12:19.000]    “That’s correct, there is only one Islam, and to Muslims Islam is synonymous with good.
[00:12:25.000]    Without a doubt there will be a differences between Muslims in Indonesia and Morocco,
[00:12:29.000]    but the content of Islam is established”. Judge: Then another quote:
[00:12:34.000]    “Islam is the Quran and nothing but the Quran”. Mr. Jansen:
[00:12:39.000]    “Islam is more than the Quran, namely the Shariah and the traditions.
[00:12:44.000]    But the Quran is important because in it is stated that everything comes from God.
[00:12:49.000]    Usually the Quran is published in an annotated version.
[00:12:53.000]    Then after every Qur’anic verse a comment is included from the tradition.
[00:13:00.000]    With the tradition I mean the collected canonical traditions about Muhammad’s actions and expressions.
[00:13:07.000]    Most Muslims do not make a sharp distinction between these comments
[00:13:11.000]    and the verses themselves, and regard all as the Quran”.
[00:13:17.000]    Then the comparison between the Quran and Mein Kampf. Jansen says:
[00:13:22.000]    “I understand that the Dutch get angry about this expression. Mein Kampf, however
[00:13:27.000]    is freely available in the Middle East and a standard or popular book in every bookstore.
[00:13:32.000]    Bill Warner, I know he is not authorized by the court as a witness in this trial,
[00:13:37.000]    has compared how many of passages in the Quran and Mein Kampf are anti-Semitic.
[00:13:43.000]    In the Qur’an there are more such passages. The article you can find on the Internet,
[00:13:48.000]    and the end results of his research have so far not been challenged”.
[00:13:55.000]    Then the term “Elimination”. Mr. Jansen says: “The Quran talks of ‘waging war’.
[00:14:00.000]    In the Quran are 164 passages that call to war. About the killing of infidels for example
[00:14:08.000]    in sura 9:30, ‘anyone who believes that Christ is the Son of God must be slain’.”
[00:14:18.000]    Then the term “Dogs”. Mr. Jansen says:
[00:14:22.000]    “This word appears once in the Quran, as a naming for non-Muslims.
[00:14:27.000]    Furthermore, non-Muslims are called ‘foul beasts’ ….”
[00:14:29.000]

Texte de la video 2

00:00    Following quote, page 2, first paragraph, last sentence.
00:07    “This quote by Oriana Fallaci is partly correct,” says Mr. Jansen.
00:14    “The evil not only comes from the Quran, but also and especially from the Sharia.
00:19    The Quran is important in the sense that it says that it is not a human invention
00:24    but the Divine truth.”
00:28    Then the expression “The Fascist Islam”. On this Mr. Jansen says:
00:34    “I’m no expert on fascism. I find ‘fascism’ a curse. It implies there is no room for dissenters.
00:42    In this I see the resemblance with Islam.”
00:48    Next quote: “Sick ideology.” Mr. Jansen says:
00:53    “I do not want to express a value judgment. Islam but is an ideology.
00:59    Islam calls for action by its supporters, and that action is aimed at the entire society.
01:04    From divorce to the organization of banking. Other religions do not demand that in this manner.
01:12    The ideology comes forth from the Quran. That is where it begins, but also the Shariah
01:17    and the traditions must be counted in. I have just shown that, and why,
01:22    many Muslims view the Sharia and the traditions with the Quran as one.”
01:28    Then a quote: “Ban that wretched book.” Mr. Jansen says:
01:33    “My personal opinion is that banning is not a good proposal. People should rather read the Quran,
01:39    for in the Netherlands already much is forbidden which the Quran calls for, such as killing infidels
01:45    or the cutting off of hands.” This quote is regarding to Fact 1 on the summons.
01:53    Then with respect to Fact 2 on the summons. There the questioning continues on to page 3,
02:01    second paragraph, and in the sequel I understand it’s about the demographic
02:07    development of Muslims in Europe. And Mr. Jansen says the following about this:
02:11    “I was recently at a conference organized by the Burke Foundation.
02:16    Statistics were presented on the demographics of Muslims in Europe.
02:22    You can ask Bart Jan Spruyt [of the BF] about this aspect. The Islamic world is growing,
02:27    Europe is shrinking. This has for example to do with the Dutch having
02:30    an average of 2 children per family, and Muslims have more.
02:35    American demographers have calculated this, there are ever-increasing numbers of Muslims in Europe.
02:40    This can be problematic, because as I said, 20% of them believe literally in what Islam commands
02:47    and want to carry that out. These people want to call the shots over others.
02:52    There is no religion that wants to go that far with domination as Islam.
02:57    What in the quote is wrong is that Muslims will draw to the countryside.
03:02    Islam is primarily an urban religion.” As Mr. Jansen says.
03:08    He further says: “In the Netherlands, politics and religion in principle are separated,
03:13    but in Islam this is not so. In Islamic countries the secret service can take action
03:18    when imams in sermons proclaim things that are not appreciated.
03:23    In the Netherlands this in principle is not so. In Dutch mosques anything can be said
03:28    without the state being able to interfere. This is why many Muslims,
03:33    especially radical leaders, move to Europe.” According to Mr. Jansen.
03:38
03:47    Then page 4, first paragraph, and that’s the quote in which professor Israeli is cited,
03:57    then Mr. Jansen says: “Professor Israeli bases this statement on expressions of Sayyid Qutb.”
04:05    Judge: I do not know how to exactly to pronounce it but it’s spelled q-u-t-b.
04:16    [Mr. Jansen continues] “A prominent man, the most widely read Muslim writer ever.
04:21    He said that the Muslims have tried twice to win the battle
04:25    and that now the third round, the final battle, is being fought.
04:29    On a question from the prosecutor on what powers would be behind this invasion attempt,
04:35    I can not give an explicit answer, but I do can point to the document ‘Le Projet’ [The Project]
04:42    from the 30s or 40s of the 20th century. This document comes among others
04:48    from the father of Tariq Ramadan. In this is stated
04:52    that Muslims must make use of Western freedoms.
04:56    Once you have a large group, you automatically get the 20% who will fight for Islam,
05:03    [who] will attempt to impose the rules of Islam. As an example, I can mention
05:09    that there are Muslim countries that do not take [their] people back.”
05:16    Then over to page 4, quote “The Muslim population doubles every generation”.
05:25    Asked about this, Mr. Jansen says: “On this I cannot really say anything.
05:30    There are articles stating how large the percentage of Muslims within a society must be
05:36    in order to expect problems.”
05:40    Further to page 4, third paragraph from the bottom, quote: “Islam is a violent religion”.
05:48    Mr. Jansen: “Where the Bible merely contains dreams or stories containing violence,
05:53    the Qur’an contains commands to violence in the imperative.
05:58    It is an obligation, and the reward is great. I can quote Roger Scruton about this:
06:05    ‘Christianity is a religion of failure, but became a success, Islam is a religion of success,
06:12    but leads to monstrosities, and thus to failure.’” As Mr. Jansen stated.
06:18    “Fortunately not all Muslims take the command to violence seriously, but some unfortunately do.
06:25    There is an expression: ‘first a warning with the tongue, then a spanking by the hand
06:32    and finally murder with the sword’. I will look up for you [the Magistrate]
06:38    exactly where that is stated. A Muslim will undoubtedly say that it’s in the Quran.”
06:47    Then to page 5, quote: “This book incites to hatred and murder”. Mr. Jansen:
06:56    “Yes. Anyone who reads ten pages in the Quran will see that this is true,
07:00    as long as it is only about unbelievers.”
07:04    Then on page 6 of the summons, on the Quran and the size of the Donald Duck [comic].
07:12    Mr. Jansen answers: “There of course are verses that are not hateful.
07:16    Care for the orphan, giving of alms. If you were to leave out all hateful verses from the Quran,
07:23    it would be considerably thinner. Then about one quarter to one-fifth would remain.”
07:32    Next quote, page 6, “The Quran is not a dead letter”. Mr. Jansen says:
07:39    “Every Muslim father wants his son to learn the Quran by heart.
07:44    In everyday parlance the Quran is often quoted. If you ask a Muslim
07:50    whether Sharia law must be applied, he will say ‘Yes’. When you then ask
07:55    if a thief’s hand then must be cut off, he sometimes says ‘No’,
08:00    because he doesn’t know that this is in the Sharia. If you say that it’s in the Sharia,
08:05    he then will say, ‘Well, then so be it’. For resistance against the Shariah is apostasy,
08:12    and for that, according to the Sharia, the death penalty is required. Historians of religion
08:18    will say that the religion is what believers make of it. But Muslims believe that Islam
08:24    — thus everything written — is valid, and exists without possibility of influence by its followers.
08:34.    On questions by the prosecutor that he understood that in Indonesia
08:38    a mild form of Islam is adhered to, I say that there also Islam becomes ever more strict.
08:47    The imams there say the same as in other Muslim countries, more headscarves appear there,
08:52    and to take the wind out the sails of the fundamentalist Muslim groups,
08:57    the [Indonesian] government is taking Islamizing measures. Therein lies a danger.”
09:06    Next quote from page 12 of the summons, on Moroccan boys, and then the quote:
09:17    “They beat up people because of their sexual orientation” Mr. Jansen says:
09:24    “It’s difficult to respond to that. I mention as example a fatwa issued by an imam, Al-Moumni.
09:32    When a young boy asked whether in the context of jihad one may commit debauchery with girls,
09:37    he answered that it is better to just get married. He then does not explicitly forbid it.
09:44    Many Moroccan boys often are unconsciously busy with their religion.
09:49    There are known examples of banging on the windows of non-Muslims in the neighborhood.
09:54    This cannot really be called criminal, but eventually the non-Muslims will move out.
10:00    Homosexuality may not become public. In Iran there is the death penalty for it,
10:06    and this is also carried out. Al-Moumni said gay sexuality is a disease,
10:13    thus you cannot help it. Which he himself found progressive.
10:18    The Quran says that sodomy is a grave sin, worse than adultery.
10:25    Who commits sodomy must be slain, and lesbian behavior is equivalent to adultery,
10:30    for this is also the death penalty. You can find this for instance in the book
10:35    ‘Reliance of the Traveller’, a standard work on the Sharia for Muslims.”
10:43    Then back to page 3, the quote, “Their behavior stems from their religion and culture”,
10:54    again on Moroccan boys. Mr. Jansen responds:
10:59    “That’s somewhat correct. This involves in particular the efforts at harassment.
11:05    Banging on windows and throwing of stones. This is being done primarily by brats,
11:10    but their parents approve of this behavior. This behavior is insufficient to take up arms against,
11:15    but is enough to make people move out. We would love it if we could find something
11:21    outside of Islam which explains the behavior, but Islam approves it,
11:26    and provides a justification, also when it comes to snatching purses.
11:31    When the Magistrate asks me whether a Moroccan boy will ever snatch a purse of a Muslim,
11:37    I say that this is possible, but I consider that rather unlikely.”
11:52    The hearing continues on the film Fitna. On this Mr. Jansen says the following.
11:58    “I’ve seen this film in the studio in Hilversum, on request by the NOS (broadcaster).
12:03    I was asked whether I wanted to comment, whether the translations were accurate
12:07    and if I ever seen the images before. I do not dare to guarantee that the version I’ve seen
12:14    later in edited or photoshopped form started to circulate on the Internet.
12:20    Whether the Sura translations are adequate?” Mr. Jansen: “Yes.
12:25    Sura 8 verse 60: the singer in the film only repeats the word ‘terrorizing’
12:33    while in that Quran-verse it only appears once.
12:38    Terrorizing,” according to Mr. Jansen, “is a correct translation of ‘tuhibuna’.
12:45    You of course can always try a synonym such as ‘strike fear’ or ‘make scared’,
12:50    but an Arab will translate this word as ‘terrorizing’.
12:56    How do I know images are shown of what apparently are imams?
13:03    I haven’t seen their diploma, but the clothing and ways of talking raise
13:08    the impression in me that those are imams. The book shown with oriental writing
13:14    is of course the Quran.
13:18    It disappoints me that the Prosecutor did not have this researched well in advance.”
13:24    Mr. Jansen continues: “In Muslim circles I have never seen anyone give the Hitler salute.”
13:29    And then further also says: “Statements about Jews and violence against Jews
13:34    are not uncommon in the Muslim world. These statements are not out of context.
13:40    Every believer finds of his own belief that it is superior. If you do not pursue Islam,
13:46    then you are a bad person. If you as a Muslim leave Islam, there is the death penalty.
13:52    Is a criminal court does not assign this punishment, an individual must execute this.
13:59    Allah has ordered that Islam should be spread globally, if necessary by arms.
14:05    Whether I can mention sources for this?” Judge: Then Mr. Jansen mentions
14:09    Sura 2:16, 4:89, 9:36. “Fortunately, many Muslims are too decent to execute this.
14:21    Christianity is less obligational.” Judge: Mr. Jansen talks about preaching the word to all peoples.
14:29    Next question, whether violence against women is common practice in Islam.
14:33    Mr. Jansen says: “You’d have to ask a sociologist. The Quran does state
14:38    that if you’re afraid that your wife does something that is not allowed, you must hit her.
14:55    Sura 4:34. There are men who take this seriously, and preachers proclaim this verse.”
14:59

Texte de la video 3

[00:00:00.000]    “The West dominates, but according to Muslims, Islam should do this,” as Mr. Jansen says.
[00:00:08.000]    Whether radical groups have any influence on mosques in the Netherlands? Mr. Jansen replies:
[00:00:15.000]    “Yes, especially Saudi Arabian Islam, Wahhabism, and the radical Salafists,
[00:00:23.000]    of that there is an increasing influence. I base that on newspaper articles,
[00:00:29.000]    reports from the AIVD [Dutch Intelligence Service], but also on conversations
[00:00:33.000]    with people in that world, for example Abdul Jabbar van de Ven. He told me proudly
[00:00:39.000]    that he studied in Saudi Arabia and pleads for the introduction of Sharia law
[00:00:45.000]    and a ban on music. For that matter, this can be traced back
[00:00:49.000]    to a statement by Muhammad.” And then a quote:
[00:00:54.000]    “I have been sent to remove the lute, the jar and the cross.” Mr. Jansen continues:
[00:01:00.000]    “I also talked to two guys who make a television program called ‘Sal and Ab’.
[00:01:06.000]    They too were proud that they had been to Saudi Arabia.”
[00:01:13.000]    Up until this point the questions asked were in response to specific citations in the subpoena.
[00:01:20.000]    There now follow a few general questions. First questions by the Prosecutor.
[00:01:28.000]    On questions by the prosecutor, Mr. Jansen says the following:
[00:01:33.000]    Asked whether in the Muslim world there is talk of secularism, Mr. Jansen says:
[00:01:38.000]    “No, the opposite is true. I know there are friends of Islam who claim that there is
[00:01:45.000]    a slow extinction of the faith, but I think they are wrong.
[00:01:50.000]    The mood currently is more religious than ever. When I was in Cairo in 1966,
[00:01:56.000]    there was not a headscarf to be seen. Now there is not woman seen without a headscarf.
[00:02:01.000]    It is a symbol of the introduction of the Sharia. There are libraries full of books
[00:02:06.000]    that defend my position and only a few shelves that say there is secularism.
[00:02:12.000]    Those few shelves, however, are in charge in the Netherlands.
[00:02:16.000]    They get the money for scientific research.”
[00:02:21.000]    Mr. Jansen continues: “You ask me about the separation between religion and politics.
[00:02:26.000]    Muslims know that they are two different things, but that’s about all.
[00:02:31.000]    You must also keep in mind that at the beginning of Islam, in Muhammad’s days,
[00:02:36.000]    society was stateless. In Islam, politics and religion therefore went hand in hand.
[00:02:44.000]    The sultans were always in control. There was some rope-pulling with religious leaders,
[00:02:50.000]    but there could not be any distance between religious and secular leaders.”
[00:02:56.000]    Judge: I must read the word ‘and’ thus ‘religious and secular’
[00:03:05.000]    “The sultan is the boss, and the imams take the place of parliament.
[00:03:11.000]    In Iran this is different, because there the ayatollahs are in control.”
[00:03:19.000]    “The Magistrate tells me my name appears in the summons on page 10.”
[00:03:30.000]    Mr. Jansen then says: “This quote is the headline of an article I wrote,
[00:03:35.000]    Judge, and I didn’t know in advance that this would end up in the film” [Fitna].
[00:03:42.000]    Then a question by the Prosecutor: “The Prosecutor asks me how it could happen
[00:03:48.000]    that the medieval Christians and Jews could have a separate status.”
[00:03:53.000]    Mr. Jansen relies: “I refer to sura 9:29. Christians and Jews may temporarily,
[00:03:58.000]    Judge, for a fee, be exempt from Islamic rules.
[00:04:02.000]    It is so, however, that they can not be exempted from tax.
[00:04:07.000]    One must continue to admit that Islam is superior. This is symbolized by the collector of the tax,
[00:04:13.000]    Who strikes a blow on the neck as a symbol of decapitation.”
[00:04:18.000]    Mr. Jansen continues: “I know the friends of Islam use this example as a sign of tolerance,
[00:04:24.000]    but rather it is not, according to my lights. It remains a symbol of Islamic superiority.
[00:04:31.000]    It is the myth of Andalusia that Christians, Jews and Muslims can live together.
[00:04:37.000]    Weinstein, a classicist in Dublin, wrote about this.
[00:04:42.000]    This myth came to live in Russia at the time of the Tsars,
[00:04:48.000]    to make it possible for Jews to study [at the university].
[00:04:53.000]    In this context I point out a study by Rodney Stark, who has calculated
[00:04:59.000]    that there were no fewer pogroms in Andalusia than elsewhere in Europe.
[00:05:06.000]    The Prosecutor asks me about Granada, whether that was the peak of the Jewish flowering
[00:05:12.000]    within Islam. I do no know so much about that,” answers Mr. Jansen.
[00:05:20.000]    Then there are a number of questions by the defense [Mr. Moszkowicz]
[00:05:27.000]    On questions by Mr. Moszkowicz: “You tell me that a number of Dutch Islam experts,
[00:05:31.000]    including Professor Leemhuis, have circulated a so-called fact sheet.
[00:05:37.000]    I had a quick look on this fact sheet, but there are so many spelling errors in it
[00:05:41.000]    that I didn’t pay much attention to it. You tell me that the fact sheet says
[00:05:45.000]    that in the film Fitna, sura 47:4 is only partially quoted, and thus out of context.”
[00:05:54.000]    The response by Mr. Jansen: “That it is partially quoted is correct,
[00:05:59.000]    following the quote in the film, there should be quoted that when the opponents are overcome,
[00:06:05.000]    they should be sold as slaves. The second half of this verse in my eyes
[00:06:10.000]    Does not make the first part less bad. The whole verse says nothing more than
[00:06:15.000]    that you only stop cutting off heads once the enemy surrenders,
[00:06:21.000]    or has converted to Islam. It thus is not taken out of context.”
[00:06:27.000]    Thus Mr. Jansen, and he illustrates: “In sermons and in general by Muslims,
[00:06:33.000]    this verse is quoted as is done in Fitna. That is, only the first half.
[00:06:39.000]    There are also two verse-enumerations, see for example the translation
[00:06:44.000]    of the Quran by Kramers I edited, and scholars from Kufa,
[00:06:48.000]    who view this as one verse, but scholars form Basra see it as two verses.
[00:06:53.000]    Sura 47:4, as quoted in Fitna, and Sura 47:5, which is what follows.”
[00:07:05.000]    Mr. Moszkowicz seemingly continues, and then Mr. Jansen says:
[00:07:10.000]    “You tell me that on the fact sheet is stated that in Sura 2:256 states
[00:07:18.000]    that there is no compulsion in the religion. When the Quran was revealed in Mecca
[00:07:27.000]    it called for freedom for the followers of Muhammad. When the Quran
[00:07:32.000]    was revealed in Medina, death to the infidels was preached.
[00:07:36.000]    Ultimately, that last position in Medina has won. As time progressed,
[00:07:42.000]    the original texts were annulled by later revelations. This is called “abrogation”.
[00:07:51.000]    Leemhuis [involved with that ‘fact sheet’] should know that Sura 2:256 has been abrogated.
[00:07:57.000]    For Muslims, there is no discussion about this. I will forward you later the
[00:08:02.000]    the location of this abrogation, but you should also ask Leemhuis, under oath.”
[00:08:08.000]    Then Dr. Jansen in this respect sent a letter to the Magistrate
[00:08:20.000]    with respect to that Quran verse 2:256 “There is no compulsion in religion”
[00:08:26.000]    in which he gives a detailed information about that verse.
[00:08:30.000]    Do you want me to also read out that later? [Mr. Moszkowicz: “Please.”]
[00:08:34.000]    All right, I first continue the hearing, then I go to that explanation.
[00:08:43.000]    Mr. Jansen has just said, this is an abrogation, and then the next point
[00:08:54.000]    from the fact sheet as shown by Mr. Moszkowicz, says that
[00:08:58.000]    the Quran also calls to peace and reconciliation. For instance in the verse 2:84,
[00:09:05.000]    “You shall not shed each other’s blood”. Mr. Jansen says concerning this:
[00:09:09.000]    “That is not correct, this verse applies only to Muslims among themselves.”
[00:09:14.000]    And regarding Sura 10:25 Mr. Jansen says
[00:09:19.000]    — there it says ‘God calls for the house of peace’ —
[00:09:25.000]    “The residence or the house of peace is Islam, in opposition to the house of war.
[00:09:30.000]    This verse thus means that you must become Muslim and should come and live
[00:09:36.000]    within the Muslim community.” Then Sura 2:224,
[00:09:44.000]    “Make not Allah an impediment to … making peace between the people”.
[00:09:54.000]    And Mr. Jansen responds on this:
[00:09:58.000]    “I read this complete verse now in the Quran I have with me.
[00:10:03.000]    There it’s about an oath made in haste. This does not have to prevent you
[00:10:08.000]    from still doing the good. Usually then it is about too quickly banishing your wife.
[00:10:13.000]    I do not see the word ‘peacemaking’, I’d rather translate the word as
[00:10:18.000]    ‘make it up again’ or ‘repair’.
[00:10:22.000]    Then Mr. Jansen is shown Sura 3:103, “Think of God’s grace to you
[00:10:30.000]    when you were enemies and He brought your hearts together, and you became brothers by His grace”.
[00:10:37.000]    Mr. Jansen says: “According to the commentaries, this is said against the various groups in Medina. It addresses to Muslims. ‘Becoming brothers’ means nothing more
[00:10:49.000]    than the conversion to Islam. ‘Think of God’s grace’ usually means
[00:10:53.000]    ‘read the Quran’. It is an internal Muslim verse.”
[00:11:01.000]    Mr. Jansen continues: “As Western philologist you may think ‘I use these verses
[00:11:06.000]    to illustrate the peacefulness of Islam’, and maybe Leemhuis also sincerely means this.
[00:11:14.000]    It is important however that these texts are addressed to Muslims, and it’s about
[00:11:19.000]    what Muslims think of them. I do not know any verses,” he says,
[00:11:25.000]    “which call for peace with non-Muslims. Co-existence is not in the Islamic dictionary.
[00:11:32.000]    In practice it does happen, but only when all the armies of the non-Muslims
[00:11:36.000]    — for example the armies of the West — are stronger.”
[00:11:40.000]    Thus the hearing of Mr. Jansen, also undersigned by him.
[00:11:48.000]

Texte de la video 4

[00:00:00.000]    the Quran also calls to peace and reconciliation. For instance in the verse 2:84,
[00:00:05.000]    “You shall not shed each other’s blood”. Mr. Jansen says concerning this:
[00:00:09.000]    “That is not correct, this verse applies only to Muslims among themselves.”
[00:00:14.000]    And regarding Sura 10:25 Mr. Jansen says
[00:00:19.000]    — there it says ‘God calls for the house of peace’ —
[00:00:25.000]    “The residence or the house of peace is Islam, in opposition to the house of war.
[00:00:30.000]    This verse thus means that you must become Muslim and should come and live
[00:00:36.000]    within the Muslim community.” Then Sura 2:224,
[00:00:44.000]    “Make not Allah an impediment to … making peace between the people”.
[00:00:54.000]    And Mr. Jansen responds on this:
[00:00:58.000]    “I read this complete verse now in the Quran I have with me.
[00:01:03.000]    There it’s about an oath made in haste. This does not have to prevent you
[00:01:08.000]    from still doing the good. Usually then it is about too quickly banishing your wife.
[00:01:13.000]    I do not see the word ‘peacemaking’, I’d rather translate the word as
[00:01:18.000]    ‘make it up again’ or ‘repair’.
[00:01:22.000]    Then Mr. Jansen is shown Sura 3:103, “Think of God’s grace to you
[00:01:30.000]    when you were enemies and He brought your hearts together,
[00:01:34.000]    and you became brothers by His grace”.
[00:01:37.000]    Mr. Jansen says: “According to the commentaries, this is said against the various groups in Medina.
[00:01:42.000]    It addresses to Muslims. ‘Becoming brothers’ means nothing more
[00:01:49.000]    than the conversion to Islam. ‘Think of God’s grace’ usually means
[00:01:53.000]    ‘read the Quran’. It is an internal Muslim verse.”
[00:02:01.000]    Mr. Jansen continues: “As Western philologist you may think ‘I use these verses
[00:02:06.000]    to illustrate the peacefulness of Islam’, and maybe Leemhuis also sincerely means this.
[00:02:14.000]    It is important however that these texts are addressed to Muslims, and it’s about
[00:02:19.000]    what Muslims think of them. I do not know any verses,” he says,
[00:02:25.000]    “which call for peace with non-Muslims. Co-existence is not in the Islamic dictionary.
[00:02:32.000]    In practice it does happen, but only when all the armies of the non-Muslims
[00:02:36.000]    — for example the armies of the West — are stronger.”
[00:02:40.000]    Thus the hearing of Mr. Jansen, also undersigned by him.
[00:02:50.000]    Well, then there is a comment made by the magistrate that in consultation with you the fact sheet is not attached as a writ.
[00:03:01.000]    Then I go to the note by Professor Jansen on the Quranic verse 2:256
[00:03:11.000]    which was mentioned in the hearing, and on May 10 2010
[00:03:14.000]    in what appears to be an email, he wrote to the magistrate in Amsterdam.
[00:03:28.000]    1. Memorandum on the Qur’anic verse 2:256, “There is no compulsion in religion”.
[00:03:38.000]    Islam teaches that this verse is ‘abrogated’, i.e. ‘canceled’ by later revelations.
[00:03:44.000]    Note: Sura 2, where this Quran verse occurs, is according to friend and foe alike the first sura
[00:03:50.000]    that was revealed in Medina. I consider it impossible that the complainants
[00:03:55.000]    or the Prosecutor could find an Islamic lawyer or an academic Arabist who contradicts this.
[00:04:01.000]    I regard it therefore as superfluous to spend additional work, time and attention
[00:04:07.000]    to this issue of dating and chronology. The dating of Sura 2 is widely undisputed.
[00:04:13.000]    See for example W. Montgomery Watt, Introduction to the Qur’an’
[00:04:18.000]    Page 2:20, top: “All chronological classifications consider sura 2 as the first of the Medinan suras”.
[00:04:34.000]    And Jansen then follows with this note: Also the Quran translation by Fred Leemhuis
[00:04:39.000]    states that Sura 9 dates from Medina (p. 129), and was revealed after Sura 5.
[00:04:44.000]    Of Sura 5, Leemhuis then says that this was handed down after 48 (p. 77), and so on.
[00:04:51.000]    Also according to Leemhuis, Sura 2 thus is older than Sura 9.
[00:04:57.000]    Then Jansen continues: Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, established himself in Medina in 622,
[00:05:02.000]    where he died in 632. Sura 9, according to friend and foe alike dates from a later phase
[00:05:09.000]    of that period in Medina, in any case, according to most scholars, after the conquest of Mecca
[00:05:15.000]    by the Muslims in 630. There are even scholars who believe that Sura 9
[00:05:20.000]    is the last Sura that was revealed in Medina. Eventual contradictions between Sura 9 and Sura 2
[00:05:27.000]    are therefore decided, in the sense that the rules as laid down in Sura 9,
[00:05:32.000]    must be the prevailing rules of Islam and the Sharia.
[00:05:37.000]    How can we be so sure that this is so? In the ‘Reliance of the Traveller’,
[00:05:43.000]    the oft-mentioned English-Arabic Sharia handbook by N.H.M. Keller, we read on p.629:
[00:05:54.000]    “When two primary texts seem to contend, [the judge] gives precedence to:
[00:06:00.000]    those which supercede previous rulings.”
[00:06:04.000]    The word ‘previous’ here is crucial for the understanding. This book, ‘Reliance’,
[00:06:08.000]    I mention here only because of the fact that in this case it is already more or less known,
[00:06:13.000]    but there no handbooks on Islam and the Sharia exist that are made by Muslims for Muslims
[00:06:19.000]    that on this matter state anything different.
[00:06:23.000]    The principle of abrogation is explicated in the Qur’an itself; it is not the invention of outsiders.
[00:06:29.000]    Qur’an 2:106, in the translation of Leemhuis and then a quote:
[00:06:35.000]    “Whatever of our revelations that we abolish or cause to be forgotten we replace by
[00:06:40.000]    something better or similar”. End quote.
[00:06:44.000]    ‘Abolish’ is the word with which in both Leemhuis as Kramers clarify as “abrogate”.
[00:06:53.000]    Qur’an 10:52: “God abolishes”.
[00:07:00.000]    Sura 9 dates from the period in Medina, which means: 622-632 AD.
[00:07:07.000]    It is not the first sura of that period, because Sura 2 is considered as such.
[00:07:12.000]    Sura 9 in time is thus after Sura 2, and Sura 9 consequently abrogates the rules
[00:07:18.000]    contained in Sura 2, when these are in conflict with provisions contained in Sura 9.
[00:07:25.000]    Sura 9:29 in the translation of Leemhuis, contains the phrase
[00:07:31.000]    “Fight against those who do not believe in God” and who “Do not forbid what God
[00:07:36.000]    and his Messenger forbid.” This forbidding cannot be made consistent with
[00:07:42.000]    “there is no compulsion in religion”, of 2:256. Forbidding, after all, implies coercion.
[00:07:50.000]    The imperative with which verse 9:29 begins, ‘qaatiluu’,
[00:07:69.000]    is better translated as “waged war upon”. The root ‘qtl’, which the word is related to,
[00:08:05.000]    means ‘killing’. The specific grammatical form being used here, according to grammarians,
[00:08:12.000]    could just as well be based on a meaning such as “trying to kill each other”.
[00:08:20.000]    Also here, neither the complaining party nor the Prosecutor will find an Islamic legal scholar
[00:08:26.000]    or an academic Arabist who contradicts this. Thus says Mr. Jansen. And he continues:
[00:08:33.000]    That this struggle or war at a given moment ends, is in practice correct.
[00:08:39.000]    In theory the Islamic legal scholars and scholars of Islam nonetheless establish
[00:08:43.000]    that the duty to wage this struggle will remain until the Last Day.
[00:08:47.000]    In the ‘Reliance’, the author states on page 602, the last lines of the page,
[00:08:53.000]    that the obligation to wage Jihad in the English text: “the time and place for it”,
[00:08:59.000]    remains until the return of Jesus, in the English text: “the final descent of Jesus,
[00:09:05.000]    upon whom be peace”. Also here, the complaining party or the Prosecutor
[00:09:11.000]    will not find an Islamic legal scholar or scholar of Islam or academic Arabist
[00:09:15.000]    who contradicts it. The Islamic legal scholars and scholars of Islam
[00:09:20.000]    therefore traditionally make a sharp distinction between the
[00:09:24.000]    ‘the House of Peace’ and ‘the House of War’.
[00:09:28.000]    This distinction is the foundation of Islamic international law.
[00:09:34.000]    About this dichotomy an extensive literature exists. I can hardly imagine that an academic Arabist
[00:09:28.000]    or an Islamic legal scholar or a scholar of Islam desires to publicly deceive a court on this matter.
[00:09:50.000]
[00:09:54.000]    Then I get to the last paragraph, and its title is “In the issue that correction
[00:10:01.000]    of un-Islamic behavior should be done first verbally and then by force”:
[00:10:08.000]    From the canonical tradition-collection of Muslim, 9th century AD…
[00:10:17.000]    A very comprehensive English quotation, would you want me to read that?
[00:10:22.000]    Moszkowicz: “Not the English quotation, according to me.”
[00:10:27.000]    Then I will say here what Professor Jansen said about this:
[00:10:33.000]    The announcement of hand, tongue and heart is also in the canonical collection
[00:10:38.000]    of Abuu Daawuud: Kitaab as-Salaat (Al-Khaalidii)
[00:10:45.000]    “Who sees a forbidden thing he can change with his hand, let him change it
[00:10:52.000]    with his hand: and if he cannot, then with his tongue, and if he cannot,
[00:10:58.000]    then with his heart, and that is the weakest form of faith.” End quote.
[00:11:04.000]    I am prepared if necessary — according to Professor Jansen — when the Prosecutor
[00:11:08.000]    or the complaining party disputes this, to further elaborate these issues.
[00:11:14.000]    And he still has a closing comment, and that final point is:
[00:11:19.000]    At last I can inform you about my surprise that a Dutch court steeps itself so much
[00:11:24.000]    in the details of religious and exegetical issues. This is contrary to everything
[00:11:29.000]    I have been taught in elementary school, college and at the university
[00:11:33.000]    about the separation of powers and the separation between religion and politics,
[00:11:37.000]    between church and state, etc. — Thus said Professor Jansen,
[00:11:42.000]    with all kinds of esteem, Amsterdam, May 10, 2010. That … Professor Jansen.
[00:11:53.000]    Moszkowicz: “Thank you very much. President, with gratitude for what has already happened,
[00:11:58.000]    there is a letter, and I’d like to request you, at this time also to read out,
[00:12:06.000]    because the representatives of complainants assumed a particular relationship
[00:12:10.000]    between Mr. Jansen and my client Mr. Wilders, there has been a correspondence about it,
[00:12:17.000]    and on May 10, 2010, the Magistrate, Mr. Martens wrote a letter
[00:12:23.000]    to Mister Pestman [lawyer for the complainants] about the alleged link,
[00:12:27.000]    and that letter is not long, but I would like to disclose it.
[00:12:34.000]    Yes, is this is a letter that belongs to the pleadings at this time?
[00:12:39.000]    Umm, yes, it is in my file, and then I think it also is in yours.
[00:12:44.000]    Okay, we will have a look at it.
[00:12:48.000]    Umm…  just an announcement of order here first, perhaps because I currently am doing less,
[00:12:53.000]    but I’m starting to get it a little colder, is it just me or …
[00:12:58.000]    it gets a little cooler here, okay, well above there [public] they also say that,
[00:13:01.000]    so we will try to ask to do something about that later, my proposal is now to pause now for lunch,
[00:13:07.000]    I’m taking a look at the members of the OM if that is okay, the defense, okay? Yes?
[00:13:14.000]    Then we’ll pause until 13:00, I urge you all to be back in time,
[00:13:20.000]    thus at least before 13:00, and then we will continue reading the files,
[00:13:23.000]    and will in the meanwhile also have taken a look at your request.
[00:13:27.000]    Moszkowicz: “It is of May 10…”
[00:13:29.000]    I have made a note, yes.

Gaza: Occidente es débil moralmente como para criticar a Hamas (pero no para pagarles los salarios, el dinero no tiéne remordimientos)

Gaza : L’Occident, moralement faible, n’est pas habilité à critiquer le Hamas

jihadistes

Femmes djihadistes de Gaza

El Occidente sumido en la inmoral no tiéne méritos suficientes para juzgar a Hamas ni a los preceptos musulmanes que gobiernan en  Gaza, estiman los dirigentes palestinos.

u

zahar« Nosotros tenemos el derecho de conformar nuestra vida con nuestra religion y no con la vuestra . además vosotros no tenéis religion (a Dios gracias) vosotros sois laicos.», afirmó Mahmoud al-Zahar en una entrevista a Reuters. « Vosotros no vivís como seres humanos sino como annimales. Vosotros aceptáis la homosexualidad y luego tenéis la cara de criticarnos.”dijo desde su lujoso piso en Gaza .

Tambien denunció a los estados europeos especialmente a Francia por prohibirles el velo a las mujeres musulmanas.  « Nosotros respetamos y honramos a nuestras mujeres, vosotros las tratáis como animales.  », dijo . Selon M. Zahar, la mujer occidental tiéne un marido y centenas de miles de amigos, « vosotros no sabéis quien es el padre de vuestros hijos ».

, M. Zahar es cirujano habla un pésimo inglés y es el Ministro de Re Exteriores desde el 2007. Nunca renunciará al empleo de la violencia con Israel y sin embargo sigue manteniendo discretas conversaciones con los países occidentales para la aceptación de Hamas. En junio del  2007 Hamas atacó a las fuerzas de seguridad oficiales del Presidente   Mahmoud Abbas, e islamizó progresivamente el territorio.

« Es un crimen islmizar a la población? Yo soy musulman y es mi tradición.porqué he de vivir de acuerdo a vuestras tradiciones? Vosotros sois pobres gentes sin calidad moral.Deberíais avergonzaros de defender a Israel hay que tener vergüenza de defender a Israel », No os asociéis con la gente que viene aquí a asesinar

modèles de vertu

Femmes musulmanes, modèles de vertu islamique

musulmanes

Femme de Gaza encore plus vertueuse car elle fait semblant de lire le coran

musulmanes

Femmes arabes, respectées et honorées pour leur intégrité morale

mariées

Jeunes mariées palestiniennes prenant part à un mariage collectif le mois dernier

gaza

On ne peut visiblement pas mettre en doute la spiritualité et la piété des Gazaouis…

gaza

…toujours prêts à tuer et à mourir pour Allah.

Source : L’Orient-le-jour

Tsahal Informa:

Publicado el Octubre 25, 2010 por as1944

Desde la franja de Gaza han sido disparados tres proyectiles de mortero contra Israel

Uno de ellos explotó en un campo ,sin causar daños de ninún tipo,dentro del Estado Judio.

Los otros dos cayeron en territorio árabe de Gaza.

i
Rate This

Quantcast

//
PDRTJS_settings_138387_post_21403={“id”:138387,”unique_id”:”wp-post-21403″,”title”:”Tsahal Informa:”,”permalink”:”http:\/\/bajurtov.wordpress.com\/2010\/10\/25\/tsahal-informa-4\/”,”item_id”:”_post_21403″}
//

Archivado bajo: ATENTADOS TERRORISTAS | Deja un Comentario »

CAMPEONAS DEL MUNDO,מזל טוב

Publicado el Octubre 25, 2010 por as1944

Las Fuerzas Especiales de Israel,la “yamam”,acaban de conquistar el “campeonato del mundo”de su profesión; el Urban Shield.El “Escudo humano”(que no tiene nada que ver con los que hacen los de Hamás),

Se realiza en California,en el ejercicio los policias israelitas compitieron contra otros 27 participantes.

Ante la presencia de más de 30 formaciones de Policia USA y de otros paises,los miembros de la YMM,en un equipo de ocho hombres,se movilizaron contra supuestos secuestradores, combatientes de guerrilla urbana ,terroristas armados…y consiguieron un nº de puntos como  jamás ninguna  otra formación habia conseguido.

¡FELICIDADES!

Canal de tv de Abu Mazen paga cien dólares por citar ”ciudades palestinas ocupadas ” en Israel.(financiado por Bruselas)